PFORX vs. GLAB.L
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) (PFORX) and SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (GLAB.L).
PFORX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Dec 1, 1992. GLAB.L is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP. It was launched on Feb 14, 2018.
Performance
PFORX vs. GLAB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PFORX vs. GLAB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFORX PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) | -2.23% | 4.33% | 5.70% | 9.52% | -10.33% | -1.67% | 6.17% | 7.64% | 2.54% |
GLAB.L SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged | -1.98% | 12.58% | -376.40% | 11.31% | -21.47% | -2.63% | 7.68% | 10.69% | -8.31% |
Different Trading Currencies
PFORX is traded in USD, while GLAB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the GLAB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFORX achieves a -2.23% return, which is significantly lower than GLAB.L's -1.98% return.
PFORX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -3.69%
- YTD
- -2.23%
- 6M
- -1.20%
- 1Y
- 1.73%
- 3Y*
- 4.71%
- 5Y*
- 1.08%
- 10Y*
- 2.77%
GLAB.L
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -3.66%
- YTD
- -1.98%
- 6M
- -1.10%
- 1Y
- 5.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PFORX vs. GLAB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFORX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than GLAB.L's 0.10% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PFORX vs. GLAB.L — Risk / Return Rank
PFORX
GLAB.L
PFORX vs. GLAB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) (PFORX) and SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (GLAB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PFORX | GLAB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.64 | 0.67 | -0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.89 | 1.02 | -0.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.12 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.61 | 1.00 | -0.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.82 | 2.66 | +0.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFORX | GLAB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 | 0.67 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.25 | — | — |
Correlation
The correlation between PFORX and GLAB.L is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PFORX vs. GLAB.L - Dividend Comparison
PFORX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, more than GLAB.L's 3.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFORX PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) | 3.88% | 4.23% | 4.91% | 3.02% | 3.65% | 1.55% | 2.46% | 6.86% | 2.90% | 1.46% | 1.38% | 9.12% |
GLAB.L SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged | 3.12% | 3.06% | 139.91% | 1.91% | 1.48% | 1.18% | 1.51% | 1.70% | 0.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PFORX vs. GLAB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFORX drawdown since its inception was -13.87%, smaller than the maximum GLAB.L drawdown of -367.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFORX and GLAB.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFORX | GLAB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.87% | -372.79% | +358.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.99% | -2.26% | -1.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.71% | -373.54% | +359.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -13.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.69% | -367.73% | +364.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.95% | -78.13% | +76.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.87% | 0.65% | +0.22% |
Volatility
PFORX vs. GLAB.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) (PFORX) is 1.93%, while SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (GLAB.L) has a volatility of 3.22%. This indicates that PFORX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLAB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PFORX | GLAB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.93% | 3.22% | -1.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.53% | 5.46% | -2.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.38% | 8.71% | -5.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.46% | 166.64% | -163.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.08% | 130.84% | -127.76% |