PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFN vs. AXSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PFN vs. AXSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II (PFN) and Axonic Strategic Income Fund (AXSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PFN vs. AXSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PFN
PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II
-5.40%13.07%15.72%15.43%-17.65%5.14%4.07%
AXSIX
Axonic Strategic Income Fund
0.69%6.71%8.30%7.54%-6.81%5.91%-0.16%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFN achieves a -5.40% return, which is significantly lower than AXSIX's 0.69% return.


PFN

1D
3.77%
1M
-3.87%
YTD
-5.40%
6M
-3.80%
1Y
2.70%
3Y*
11.05%
5Y*
3.04%
10Y*
8.36%

AXSIX

1D
0.11%
1M
-1.11%
YTD
0.69%
6M
2.20%
1Y
5.38%
3Y*
7.06%
5Y*
3.79%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PFN vs. AXSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFN has a 1.74% expense ratio, which is higher than AXSIX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PFN vs. AXSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFN
PFN Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
PFN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFN Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFN Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
PFN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFN Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

AXSIX
AXSIX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
AXSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AXSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
AXSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
AXSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
AXSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFN vs. AXSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II (PFN) and Axonic Strategic Income Fund (AXSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFNAXSIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.20

2.40

-2.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.34

5.06

-4.72

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.64

-0.58

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.26

4.97

-4.71

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.02

18.44

-17.42

PFN vs. AXSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFN Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is lower than the AXSIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFN and AXSIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFNAXSIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

2.40

-2.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

1.78

-1.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.92

-0.64

Correlation

The correlation between PFN and AXSIX is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

PFN vs. AXSIX - Dividend Comparison

PFN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.51%, more than AXSIX's 6.06% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PFN
PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II
12.51%11.49%11.57%11.92%12.19%9.71%9.67%9.07%10.81%9.20%10.12%11.74%
AXSIX
Axonic Strategic Income Fund
6.06%6.39%6.52%6.24%3.89%6.70%2.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

PFN vs. AXSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFN drawdown since its inception was -80.08%, which is greater than AXSIX's maximum drawdown of -12.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFN and AXSIX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PFNAXSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.08%

-12.55%

-67.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.77%

-1.22%

-9.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.45%

-6.87%

-26.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.42%

-1.11%

-5.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.89%

-2.01%

-9.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

0.33%

+2.46%

Volatility

PFN vs. AXSIX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II (PFN) has a higher volatility of 6.57% compared to Axonic Strategic Income Fund (AXSIX) at 0.50%. This indicates that PFN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AXSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PFNAXSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.57%

0.50%

+6.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.43%

1.57%

+6.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.35%

2.51%

+10.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.75%

2.15%

+12.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.16%

3.73%

+14.43%