PCOR.TO vs. DXV.TO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO Managed Core Bond Pool (PCOR.TO) and Dynamic Active Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (DXV.TO).

PCOR.TO and DXV.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day.

Performance

PCOR.TO vs. DXV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in PIMCO Managed Core Bond Pool (PCOR.TO) and Dynamic Active Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (DXV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PCOR.TO vs. DXV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
PCOR.TO PIMCO Managed Core Bond Pool	-1.13%	7.70%	3.89%	8.31%	-9.47%	0.70%	3.78%
DXV.TO Dynamic Active Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF	0.49%	4.04%	5.84%	6.04%	1.49%	-0.21%	3.37%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCOR.TO achieves a -1.13% return, which is significantly lower than DXV.TO's 0.49% return.

PCOR.TO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -2.10%
• YTD: -1.13%
• 6M: 0.35%
• 1Y: 3.10%
• 3Y*: 5.59%
• 5Y*: 2.07%
• 10Y*: —

DXV.TO

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 0.20%
• YTD: 0.49%
• 6M: 1.31%
• 1Y: 3.64%
• 3Y*: 5.03%
• 5Y*: 3.41%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCOR.TO vs. DXV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

The portfolio doesn't include any funds that charge management fees.

Return for Risk

PCOR.TO vs. DXV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCOR.TO

PCOR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 26
PCOR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
PCOR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
PCOR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
PCOR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
PCOR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 29

DXV.TO

DXV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 97
DXV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
DXV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
DXV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 96
DXV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
DXV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCOR.TO vs. DXV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Managed Core Bond Pool (PCOR.TO) and Dynamic Active Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (DXV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PCOR.TO	DXV.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.47	2.44	-1.97
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.72	3.75	-3.03
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.51	-0.42
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.95	7.08	-6.13
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.70	34.99	-32.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PCOR.TO vs. DXV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCOR.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is lower than the DXV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCOR.TO and DXV.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PCOR.TO	DXV.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47	2.44	-1.97
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27	1.12	-0.85
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.28	0.66	-0.39

Correlation

The correlation between PCOR.TO and DXV.TO is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

PCOR.TO vs. DXV.TO - Dividend Comparison

PCOR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.09%, more than DXV.TO's 3.17% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
PCOR.TO PIMCO Managed Core Bond Pool	5.09%	5.30%	5.40%	3.50%	3.41%	2.81%	2.24%	0.00%	0.00%
DXV.TO Dynamic Active Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF	3.17%	3.35%	5.32%	6.33%	3.98%	0.69%	1.89%	2.25%	1.78%

Drawdowns

PCOR.TO vs. DXV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCOR.TO drawdown since its inception was -13.53%, which is greater than DXV.TO's maximum drawdown of -11.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCOR.TO and DXV.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	PCOR.TO	DXV.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.53%	-11.62%	-1.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.73%	-0.51%	-3.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.53%	-2.71%	-10.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.62%	-0.16%	-2.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.56%	-0.39%	-3.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.32%	0.10%	+1.22%

Volatility

PCOR.TO vs. DXV.TO - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO Managed Core Bond Pool (PCOR.TO) has a higher volatility of 1.90% compared to Dynamic Active Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (DXV.TO) at 0.62%. This indicates that PCOR.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DXV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PCOR.TO	DXV.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.90%	0.62%	+1.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.87%	1.18%	+2.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.68%	1.50%	+5.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.67%	3.05%	+4.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.52%	4.67%	+2.85%