PBMPX vs. VTIP
Compare and contrast key facts about Principal Core Plus Bond Fund (PBMPX) and Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTIP).
PBMPX is managed by Principal. It was launched on Dec 6, 2000. VTIP is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) 0-5 Year Index. It was launched on Oct 12, 2012.
Performance
PBMPX vs. VTIP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PBMPX vs. VTIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBMPX Principal Core Plus Bond Fund | -1.03% | 7.15% | 0.71% | 5.23% | -14.62% | -0.84% | 9.33% | 9.64% | -1.93% | 4.66% |
VTIP Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 0.99% | 6.07% | 4.74% | 4.62% | -2.94% | 5.36% | 4.95% | 4.86% | 0.56% | 0.82% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBMPX achieves a -1.03% return, which is significantly lower than VTIP's 0.99% return. Over the past 10 years, PBMPX has underperformed VTIP with an annualized return of 1.69%, while VTIP has yielded a comparatively higher 3.07% annualized return.
PBMPX
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- -2.61%
- YTD
- -1.03%
- 6M
- -0.19%
- 1Y
- 3.59%
- 3Y*
- 2.99%
- 5Y*
- -0.42%
- 10Y*
- 1.69%
VTIP
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- 0.99%
- 6M
- 1.37%
- 1Y
- 3.94%
- 3Y*
- 4.66%
- 5Y*
- 3.48%
- 10Y*
- 3.07%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PBMPX vs. VTIP - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBMPX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than VTIP's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PBMPX vs. VTIP — Risk / Return Rank
PBMPX
VTIP
PBMPX vs. VTIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Core Plus Bond Fund (PBMPX) and Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PBMPX | VTIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.86 | 2.09 | -1.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.21 | 3.15 | -1.93 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.44 | -0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.32 | 4.11 | -2.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.62 | 13.24 | -8.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PBMPX | VTIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 2.09 | -1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 | 1.26 | -1.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | 1.12 | -0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.87 | -0.31 |
Correlation
The correlation between PBMPX and VTIP is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PBMPX vs. VTIP - Dividend Comparison
PBMPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, more than VTIP's 3.77% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBMPX Principal Core Plus Bond Fund | 4.15% | 4.42% | 4.10% | 3.04% | 2.06% | 3.12% | 7.16% | 3.44% | 3.36% | 2.78% | 2.30% | 2.21% |
VTIP Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 3.77% | 3.81% | 2.70% | 2.86% | 6.84% | 4.68% | 1.20% | 1.95% | 2.45% | 1.52% | 0.76% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PBMPX vs. VTIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBMPX drawdown since its inception was -19.69%, which is greater than VTIP's maximum drawdown of -6.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBMPX and VTIP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBMPX | VTIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.69% | -6.27% | -13.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.16% | -0.98% | -2.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.48% | -5.50% | -13.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.48% | -6.27% | -13.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.05% | -0.26% | -4.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.45% | -1.05% | -2.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.90% | 0.30% | +0.60% |
Volatility
PBMPX vs. VTIP - Volatility Comparison
Principal Core Plus Bond Fund (PBMPX) has a higher volatility of 1.92% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTIP) at 0.60%. This indicates that PBMPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PBMPX | VTIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.92% | 0.60% | +1.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.74% | 0.97% | +1.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.36% | 1.90% | +2.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.84% | 2.78% | +3.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.80% | 2.74% | +2.06% |