PACW.L vs. ANXU.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L).
PACW.L and ANXU.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PACW.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. It was launched on Jul 24, 2025. ANXU.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. It was launched on Apr 18, 2018. Both PACW.L and ANXU.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
PACW.L vs. ANXU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PACW.L vs. ANXU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PACW.L Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income | -0.56% | 9.58% |
ANXU.L Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD | -3.64% | 8.13% |
Different Trading Currencies
PACW.L is traded in GBP, while ANXU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ANXU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PACW.L achieves a -0.56% return, which is significantly higher than ANXU.L's -3.64% return.
PACW.L
- 1D
- 2.04%
- 1M
- -3.67%
- YTD
- -0.56%
- 6M
- 3.04%
- 1Y
- 18.72%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ANXU.L
- 1D
- 3.02%
- 1M
- -1.94%
- YTD
- -3.64%
- 6M
- -0.58%
- 1Y
- 21.75%
- 3Y*
- 20.31%
- 5Y*
- 14.17%
- 10Y*
- 19.82%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PACW.L vs. ANXU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
PACW.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than ANXU.L's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
PACW.L vs. ANXU.L — Risk / Return Rank
PACW.L
ANXU.L
PACW.L vs. ANXU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PACW.L | ANXU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.33 | 1.12 | +0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.84 | 1.65 | +0.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.22 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.66 | 1.93 | +0.73 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.14 | 5.59 | +4.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PACW.L | ANXU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.33 | 1.12 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.08 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 1.20 | -0.64 |
Correlation
The correlation between PACW.L and ANXU.L is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PACW.L vs. ANXU.L - Dividend Comparison
PACW.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, while ANXU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | |
|---|---|
PACW.L Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income | 1.39% |
ANXU.L Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PACW.L vs. ANXU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PACW.L drawdown since its inception was -17.68%, smaller than the maximum ANXU.L drawdown of -27.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PACW.L and ANXU.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PACW.L | ANXU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.68% | -35.13% | +17.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.18% | -12.04% | +1.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.09% | -7.59% | +3.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.37% | -5.84% | +2.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.85% | 3.07% | -1.22% |
Volatility
PACW.L vs. ANXU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L) is 4.53%, while Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L) has a volatility of 6.04%. This indicates that PACW.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANXU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PACW.L | ANXU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.53% | 6.04% | -1.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.39% | 12.22% | -3.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.02% | 19.45% | -5.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.30% | 20.11% | -5.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.30% | 21.21% | -6.91% |