PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OWACX vs. BBLIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OWACX vs. BBLIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Old Westbury All Cap Core Fund (OWACX) and BBH Select Series - Large Cap Fund (BBLIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OWACX achieves a 6.69% return, which is significantly higher than BBLIX's 1.58% return.


OWACX

1D
0.59%
1M
-1.09%
6M
4.90%
YTD
6.69%
1Y
11.57%
3Y*
14.48%
5Y*
8.42%
10Y*
13.24%
ALL TIME*
11.99%

BBLIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
1.58%
YTD
1.58%
1Y
5.32%
3Y*
11.76%
5Y*
7.28%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

OWACX vs. BBLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
OWACX
Old Westbury All Cap Core Fund
6.69%10.45%21.30%25.93%-22.18%25.76%23.61%7.58%
BBLIX
BBH Select Series - Large Cap Fund
1.58%12.07%15.83%23.86%-20.59%27.23%12.30%3.63%

Correlation

The correlation between OWACX and BBLIX is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2019

0.85

Over the past year, the correlation between OWACX and BBLIX has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.85, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OWACX vs. BBLIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

OWACX
OWACX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
OWACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OWACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
OWACX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
OWACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
OWACX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

BBLIX
BBLIX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
BBLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
BBLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

OWACX vs. BBLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Old Westbury All Cap Core Fund (OWACX) and BBH Select Series - Large Cap Fund (BBLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OWACXBBLIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.21

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

1.38

-0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.35

2.50

+2.86

OWACX vs. BBLIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OWACX Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is comparable to the BBLIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OWACX and BBLIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OWACX vs. BBLIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OWACX drawdown since its inception was -34.01%, roughly equal to the maximum BBLIX drawdown of -33.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OWACX and BBLIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OWACXBBLIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.01%

-33.49%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.93%

-3.63%

-6.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.16%

-14.68%

-4.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.11%

-28.06%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.94%

-1.80%

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.05%

-6.24%

+1.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.28%

1.85%

+0.43%

Volatility

OWACX vs. BBLIX - Volatility Comparison

Old Westbury All Cap Core Fund (OWACX) has a higher volatility of 3.74% compared to BBH Select Series - Large Cap Fund (BBLIX) at 0.00%. This indicates that OWACX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OWACXBBLIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.74%

0.00%

+3.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.92%

1.93%

+8.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.83%

6.77%

+7.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.85%

15.83%

+2.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.45%

18.32%

+0.13%

OWACX vs. BBLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OWACX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than BBLIX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

OWACX vs. BBLIX - Dividend Comparison

OWACX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.29%, less than BBLIX's 9.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBLIX
BBH Select Series - Large Cap Fund
9.39%9.54%4.20%0.28%1.45%3.27%0.34%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OWACX
Old Westbury All Cap Core Fund
8.29%8.18%10.64%8.40%2.54%5.90%3.18%9.22%5.05%1.99%1.08%2.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


OWACX and BBLIX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OWACX has higher volatility (3.74%) compared to BBLIX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OWACX dropped -34.01% vs BBLIX's -33.49%.

OWACX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OWACX and BBLIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer