OUNZ vs. GOLD.AS
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Merk Gold Trust (OUNZ) and Amundi Physical Gold ETC C (GOLD.AS).
OUNZ and GOLD.AS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. OUNZ is a passively managed fund by Merk that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt). It was launched on May 16, 2014. GOLD.AS is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the LMBA Gold Price PM USD. It was launched on May 21, 2019. Both OUNZ and GOLD.AS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
OUNZ vs. GOLD.AS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
OUNZ vs. GOLD.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OUNZ VanEck Merk Gold Trust | 8.61% | 63.95% | 26.75% | 12.83% | -0.51% | -4.00% | 24.71% | 18.06% |
GOLD.AS Amundi Physical Gold ETC C | 6.85% | 64.94% | 26.36% | 13.35% | -0.13% | -4.09% | 24.31% | 18.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OUNZ achieves a 8.61% return, which is significantly higher than GOLD.AS's 6.85% return.
OUNZ
- 1D
- 3.75%
- 1M
- -11.06%
- YTD
- 8.61%
- 6M
- 21.13%
- 1Y
- 49.47%
- 3Y*
- 33.11%
- 5Y*
- 21.74%
- 10Y*
- 14.00%
GOLD.AS
- 1D
- 1.74%
- 1M
- -11.92%
- YTD
- 6.85%
- 6M
- 20.04%
- 1Y
- 47.58%
- 3Y*
- 32.41%
- 5Y*
- 21.53%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
OUNZ vs. GOLD.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
OUNZ has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than GOLD.AS's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
OUNZ vs. GOLD.AS — Risk / Return Rank
OUNZ
GOLD.AS
OUNZ vs. GOLD.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Merk Gold Trust (OUNZ) and Amundi Physical Gold ETC C (GOLD.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OUNZ | GOLD.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.80 | 1.82 | -0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.24 | 2.27 | -0.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.34 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | 2.71 | -0.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.98 | 10.69 | -0.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OUNZ | GOLD.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80 | 1.82 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.24 | 1.26 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 1.19 | -0.48 |
Correlation
The correlation between OUNZ and GOLD.AS is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
OUNZ vs. GOLD.AS - Dividend Comparison
Neither OUNZ nor GOLD.AS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
OUNZ vs. GOLD.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OUNZ drawdown since its inception was -21.77%, roughly equal to the maximum GOLD.AS drawdown of -21.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OUNZ and GOLD.AS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| OUNZ | GOLD.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.77% | -21.14% | -0.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.14% | -17.83% | -1.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.01% | -21.14% | +0.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.76% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.18% | -13.00% | -0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.48% | -6.14% | -1.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.17% | 4.51% | +0.66% |
Volatility
OUNZ vs. GOLD.AS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Merk Gold Trust (OUNZ) is 10.95%, while Amundi Physical Gold ETC C (GOLD.AS) has a volatility of 11.68%. This indicates that OUNZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOLD.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| OUNZ | GOLD.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.95% | 11.68% | -0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.08% | 22.21% | +1.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.59% | 25.73% | +1.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.65% | 16.86% | +0.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.88% | 16.83% | -0.95% |