PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OSTFX vs. FSKAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OSTFX vs. FSKAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Osterweis Fund (OSTFX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OSTFX achieves a 4.18% return, which is significantly lower than FSKAX's 10.43% return. Over the past 10 years, OSTFX has underperformed FSKAX with an annualized return of 12.08%, while FSKAX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.27% annualized return.


OSTFX

1D
-0.67%
1M
-0.53%
YTD
4.18%
6M
3.29%
1Y
15.34%
3Y*
14.30%
5Y*
7.20%
10Y*
12.08%

FSKAX

1D
-0.34%
1M
0.56%
YTD
10.43%
6M
9.28%
1Y
25.95%
3Y*
21.24%
5Y*
12.40%
10Y*
15.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OSTFX vs. FSKAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OSTFX
Osterweis Fund
4.18%12.85%13.48%22.64%-22.01%22.58%23.20%43.39%-7.85%14.82%
FSKAX
Fidelity Total Market Index Fund
10.43%17.06%23.89%26.12%-19.53%25.66%20.79%30.92%-5.32%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between OSTFX and FSKAX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2011

0.94

The correlation between OSTFX and FSKAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OSTFX vs. FSKAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OSTFX
OSTFX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
OSTFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OSTFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
OSTFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
OSTFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
OSTFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

FSKAX
FSKAX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FSKAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSKAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSKAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FSKAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSKAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OSTFX vs. FSKAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Osterweis Fund (OSTFX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OSTFXFSKAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.38

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

3.06

-1.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.08

13.62

-6.53

OSTFX vs. FSKAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OSTFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is lower than the FSKAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OSTFX and FSKAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OSTFX vs. FSKAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OSTFX drawdown since its inception was -40.63%, which is greater than FSKAX's maximum drawdown of -35.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OSTFX and FSKAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OSTFXFSKAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.63%

-35.01%

-5.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.06%

-8.92%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.80%

-19.43%

+3.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.62%

-25.39%

-2.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.54%

-35.01%

+2.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.52%

-1.47%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.83%

-4.01%

-2.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.31%

2.00%

+0.31%

Volatility

OSTFX vs. FSKAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Osterweis Fund (OSTFX) is 3.53%, while Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) has a volatility of 4.80%. This indicates that OSTFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSKAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OSTFXFSKAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.53%

4.80%

-1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.18%

10.10%

-0.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.83%

12.91%

-1.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.67%

17.50%

-1.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.84%

18.50%

-1.66%

OSTFX vs. FSKAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OSTFX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FSKAX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

OSTFX vs. FSKAX - Dividend Comparison

OSTFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.74%, more than FSKAX's 0.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSKAX
Fidelity Total Market Index Fund
0.95%1.01%1.19%1.41%1.62%1.15%1.45%1.94%2.54%2.07%2.43%0.82%
OSTFX
Osterweis Fund
5.74%5.98%14.93%4.01%7.81%12.83%5.48%14.46%29.80%43.97%7.35%22.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, OSTFX and FSKAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FSKAX has higher volatility (4.80%) compared to OSTFX (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OSTFX dropped -40.63% vs FSKAX's -35.01%.

FSKAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OSTFX and FSKAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer