ORV.TO vs. LGD.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Orvana Minerals Corp. (ORV.TO) and Liberty Gold Corp. (LGD.TO).
Performance
ORV.TO vs. LGD.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ORV.TO vs. LGD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ORV.TO Orvana Minerals Corp. | -17.14% | 854.55% | 46.67% | -26.83% | -33.87% | -10.14% | 115.63% | 6.67% | -37.50% | 2.13% |
LGD.TO Liberty Gold Corp. | 46.99% | 219.23% | -16.13% | -44.64% | -42.27% | -44.25% | 59.63% | 257.38% | -30.68% | -1.12% |
Fundamentals
ORV.TO:
CA$237.72M
LGD.TO:
CA$627.02M
ORV.TO:
-CA$0.15
LGD.TO:
-CA$0.05
ORV.TO:
6.08
LGD.TO:
16.74
ORV.TO:
CA$109.22M
LGD.TO:
CA$0.00
ORV.TO:
CA$35.06M
LGD.TO:
-CA$154.10K
ORV.TO:
-CA$3.04M
LGD.TO:
-CA$25.06M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ORV.TO achieves a -17.14% return, which is significantly lower than LGD.TO's 46.99% return. Over the past 10 years, ORV.TO has outperformed LGD.TO with an annualized return of 23.85%, while LGD.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 8.49% annualized return.
ORV.TO
- 1D
- 4.19%
- 1M
- -23.01%
- YTD
- -17.14%
- 6M
- 159.70%
- 1Y
- 346.15%
- 3Y*
- 103.99%
- 5Y*
- 44.62%
- 10Y*
- 23.85%
LGD.TO
- 1D
- 4.27%
- 1M
- -22.29%
- YTD
- 46.99%
- 6M
- 90.63%
- 1Y
- 264.18%
- 3Y*
- 27.40%
- 5Y*
- -3.26%
- 10Y*
- 8.49%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ORV.TO vs. LGD.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ORV.TO
LGD.TO
ORV.TO vs. LGD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Orvana Minerals Corp. (ORV.TO) and Liberty Gold Corp. (LGD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ORV.TO | LGD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.91 | 3.80 | +0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.70 | 3.83 | -0.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.49 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.80 | 6.28 | +2.52 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.84 | 20.86 | +2.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ORV.TO | LGD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.91 | 3.80 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | -0.05 | +0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | 0.13 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | 0.04 | -0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between ORV.TO and LGD.TO is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ORV.TO vs. LGD.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither ORV.TO nor LGD.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
ORV.TO vs. LGD.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ORV.TO drawdown since its inception was -99.45%, roughly equal to the maximum LGD.TO drawdown of -99.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ORV.TO and LGD.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ORV.TO | LGD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.45% | -99.66% | +0.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.00% | -41.21% | +1.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.30% | -87.15% | +8.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.30% | -90.04% | +11.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -84.18% | -98.17% | +13.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.43% | -75.97% | -6.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.77% | 12.41% | +2.36% |
Volatility
ORV.TO vs. LGD.TO - Volatility Comparison
Orvana Minerals Corp. (ORV.TO) and Liberty Gold Corp. (LGD.TO) have volatilities of 23.38% and 23.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ORV.TO | LGD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.38% | 23.34% | +0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 71.47% | 50.84% | +20.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 89.19% | 70.14% | +19.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 87.73% | 66.98% | +20.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 82.82% | 64.97% | +17.85% |
Financials
ORV.TO vs. LGD.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Orvana Minerals Corp. and Liberty Gold Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities