PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OPEN vs. TSHA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

OPEN vs. TSHA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN) and Taysha Gene Therapies, Inc. (TSHA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OPEN achieves a -23.07% return, which is significantly lower than TSHA's -2.18% return.


OPEN

1D
-5.88%
1M
1.01%
6M
-36.11%
YTD
-23.07%
1Y
494.93%
3Y*
1.44%
5Y*
-21.10%
10Y*

TSHA

1D
-15.14%
1M
-5.78%
6M
10.70%
YTD
-2.18%
1Y
103.79%
3Y*
98.20%
5Y*
-23.47%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OPEN vs. TSHA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
OPEN
Opendoor Technologies Inc.
-23.07%276.52%-64.29%286.21%-92.06%-35.72%48.85%
TSHA
Taysha Gene Therapies, Inc.
-2.18%217.92%-2.26%-21.68%-80.60%-56.10%19.28%

Correlation

The correlation between OPEN and TSHA is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2020

0.25

The correlation between OPEN and TSHA shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.27 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

OPEN:

$3.44B

TSHA:

$1.35B

EPS

OPEN:

-$1.69

TSHA:

-$0.37

PS Ratio

OPEN:

0.94

TSHA:

249.56

PB Ratio

OPEN:

4.51

TSHA:

9.31

Total Revenue (TTM)

OPEN:

$3.94B

TSHA:

$7.47M

Gross Profit (TTM)

OPEN:

$312.00M

TSHA:

$6.89M

EBITDA (TTM)

OPEN:

-$1.25B

TSHA:

-$130.51M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OPEN vs. TSHA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OPEN
OPEN Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
OPEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OPEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
OPEN Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
OPEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
OPEN Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

TSHA
TSHA Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
TSHA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSHA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSHA Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
TSHA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSHA Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OPEN vs. TSHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN) and Taysha Gene Therapies, Inc. (TSHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OPENTSHADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.27

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.50

3.35

+5.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.25

6.93

+5.32

OPEN vs. TSHA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OPEN Sharpe Ratio is 3.16, which is higher than the TSHA Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OPEN and TSHA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OPEN vs. TSHA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OPEN drawdown since its inception was -98.57%, roughly equal to the maximum TSHA drawdown of -98.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OPEN and TSHA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OPENTSHADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.57%

-98.14%

-0.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-58.75%

-31.13%

-27.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-90.28%

-72.90%

-17.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.93%

-97.26%

-0.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-87.08%

-83.06%

-4.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-74.73%

-76.88%

+2.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

40.66%

15.04%

+25.62%

Volatility

OPEN vs. TSHA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN) is 22.23%, while Taysha Gene Therapies, Inc. (TSHA) has a volatility of 24.68%. This indicates that OPEN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSHA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OPENTSHADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.23%

24.68%

-2.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.80%

52.02%

-0.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

158.11%

89.46%

+68.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

113.82%

136.66%

-22.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

109.94%

129.96%

-20.02%

Dividends

OPEN vs. TSHA - Dividend Comparison

Neither OPEN nor TSHA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

OPEN vs. TSHA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Opendoor Technologies Inc. and Taysha Gene Therapies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
720.00M
0
(OPEN) Total Revenue
(TSHA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


OPEN and TSHA have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSHA has higher volatility (24.68%) compared to OPEN (22.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OPEN dropped -98.57% vs TSHA's -98.14%.

OPEN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.16 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OPEN and TSHA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer