OPEN.L vs. CSPX.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Refinitiv Inclusion and Diversity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (OPEN.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L).
OPEN.L and CSPX.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. OPEN.L is a passively managed fund by BlackRock that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Value NR USD. It was launched on Sep 7, 2018. CSPX.L is a passively managed fund by BlackRock that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on May 18, 2010. Both OPEN.L and CSPX.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
OPEN.L vs. CSPX.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
OPEN.L vs. CSPX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OPEN.L iShares Refinitiv Inclusion and Diversity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -0.54% | 24.08% | 7.61% | 15.38% | -9.02% | 17.34% | 10.45% | 20.80% | -8.88% |
CSPX.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -4.10% | 17.45% | 25.25% | 26.74% | -18.72% | 29.35% | 17.62% | 30.55% | -12.81% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OPEN.L achieves a -0.54% return, which is significantly higher than CSPX.L's -4.10% return.
OPEN.L
- 1D
- 2.76%
- 1M
- -5.34%
- YTD
- -0.54%
- 6M
- 3.71%
- 1Y
- 17.72%
- 3Y*
- 13.50%
- 5Y*
- 8.40%
- 10Y*
- —
CSPX.L
- 1D
- 2.48%
- 1M
- -3.68%
- YTD
- -4.10%
- 6M
- -0.96%
- 1Y
- 18.28%
- 3Y*
- 18.66%
- 5Y*
- 11.79%
- 10Y*
- 13.90%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
OPEN.L vs. CSPX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
OPEN.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than CSPX.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
OPEN.L vs. CSPX.L — Risk / Return Rank
OPEN.L
CSPX.L
OPEN.L vs. CSPX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Refinitiv Inclusion and Diversity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (OPEN.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OPEN.L | CSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.11 | 1.12 | -0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.51 | 1.64 | -0.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.24 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.65 | 3.49 | -1.85 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.78 | 15.57 | -9.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OPEN.L | CSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.11 | 1.12 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.74 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.88 | -0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between OPEN.L and CSPX.L is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
OPEN.L vs. CSPX.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither OPEN.L nor CSPX.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
OPEN.L vs. CSPX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OPEN.L drawdown since its inception was -33.45%, roughly equal to the maximum CSPX.L drawdown of -33.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OPEN.L and CSPX.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| OPEN.L | CSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.45% | -33.90% | +0.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.40% | -11.83% | -0.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.59% | -24.39% | +1.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.50% | -5.43% | -2.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.27% | -3.76% | -1.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 1.83% | +1.15% |
Volatility
OPEN.L vs. CSPX.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Refinitiv Inclusion and Diversity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (OPEN.L) has a higher volatility of 5.79% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L) at 4.90%. This indicates that OPEN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSPX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| OPEN.L | CSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.79% | 4.90% | +0.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.49% | 8.88% | +0.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.91% | 16.12% | -0.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.23% | 15.95% | -0.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.94% | 16.15% | +0.79% |