PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OCTW vs. DMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

OCTW vs. DMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF (DMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

OCTW vs. DMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OCTW achieves a -0.95% return, which is significantly lower than DMAX's -0.26% return.


OCTW

1D
0.42%
1M
-1.55%
YTD
-0.95%
6M
0.51%
1Y
9.74%
3Y*
9.86%
5Y*
7.86%
10Y*

DMAX

1D
0.11%
1M
-0.73%
YTD
-0.26%
6M
1.70%
1Y
7.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


OCTW vs. DMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OCTW has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than DMAX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

OCTW vs. DMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OCTW
OCTW Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
OCTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OCTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
OCTW Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
OCTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
OCTW Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

DMAX
DMAX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
DMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
DMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OCTW vs. DMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF (DMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OCTWDMAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.22

2.25

-1.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.80

3.38

-1.58

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.51

-0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

3.94

-2.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.08

19.00

-9.92

OCTW vs. DMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OCTW Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is lower than the DMAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OCTW and DMAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OCTWDMAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.22

2.25

-1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.34

1.70

-0.36

Correlation

The correlation between OCTW and DMAX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

OCTW vs. DMAX - Dividend Comparison

OCTW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%.


Drawdowns

OCTW vs. DMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OCTW drawdown since its inception was -8.38%, which is greater than DMAX's maximum drawdown of -3.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCTW and DMAX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


OCTWDMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.38%

-3.37%

-5.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.86%

-2.00%

-3.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.93%

-0.86%

-1.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.84%

-0.42%

-0.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.10%

0.41%

+0.69%

Volatility

OCTW vs. DMAX - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW) has a higher volatility of 2.45% compared to iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF (DMAX) at 0.99%. This indicates that OCTW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


OCTWDMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.45%

0.99%

+1.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.09%

1.82%

+2.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.04%

3.45%

+4.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.25%

3.56%

+2.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.19%

3.56%

+2.63%