OAKBX vs. PRWCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Oakmark Equity and Income Fund (OAKBX) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX).
OAKBX is managed by Oakmark. It was launched on Oct 31, 1995. PRWCX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Jun 30, 1986.
Performance
OAKBX vs. PRWCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
OAKBX vs. PRWCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OAKBX Oakmark Equity and Income Fund | -3.14% | 11.05% | 8.73% | 17.39% | -12.94% | 29.12% | 8.68% | 19.39% | -8.38% | 14.43% |
PRWCX T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund | -3.22% | 20.92% | 12.50% | 18.85% | -12.00% | 18.45% | 18.13% | 24.62% | 0.63% | 15.34% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with OAKBX having a -3.14% return and PRWCX slightly lower at -3.22%. Over the past 10 years, OAKBX has underperformed PRWCX with an annualized return of 8.76%, while PRWCX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.41% annualized return.
OAKBX
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -2.99%
- YTD
- -3.14%
- 6M
- -0.30%
- 1Y
- 6.42%
- 3Y*
- 9.96%
- 5Y*
- 6.82%
- 10Y*
- 8.76%
PRWCX
- 1D
- 1.91%
- 1M
- -2.92%
- YTD
- -3.22%
- 6M
- 5.51%
- 1Y
- 16.80%
- 3Y*
- 13.72%
- 5Y*
- 9.22%
- 10Y*
- 11.41%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
OAKBX vs. PRWCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
OAKBX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than PRWCX's 0.68% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
OAKBX vs. PRWCX — Risk / Return Rank
OAKBX
PRWCX
OAKBX vs. PRWCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Oakmark Equity and Income Fund (OAKBX) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OAKBX | PRWCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.56 | 1.27 | -0.71 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.87 | 2.37 | -1.50 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.34 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.82 | 2.34 | -1.52 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.96 | 9.70 | -6.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OAKBX | PRWCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 | 1.27 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.70 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | 0.88 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 0.90 | -0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between OAKBX and PRWCX is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
OAKBX vs. PRWCX - Dividend Comparison
OAKBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, less than PRWCX's 16.24% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OAKBX Oakmark Equity and Income Fund | 2.28% | 2.16% | 2.05% | 2.28% | 1.44% | 14.26% | 4.17% | 9.07% | 10.05% | 8.09% | 4.13% | 6.53% |
PRWCX T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund | 16.24% | 15.72% | 10.38% | 4.15% | 9.44% | 9.23% | 7.97% | 5.83% | 7.46% | 6.82% | 3.51% | 9.86% |
Drawdowns
OAKBX vs. PRWCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OAKBX drawdown since its inception was -31.31%, smaller than the maximum PRWCX drawdown of -41.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OAKBX and PRWCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| OAKBX | PRWCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.31% | -41.77% | +10.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.65% | -6.80% | -1.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.41% | -17.07% | -3.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.19% | -26.86% | -3.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.06% | -4.47% | -0.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.78% | -3.34% | -0.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.39% | 1.64% | +0.75% |
Volatility
OAKBX vs. PRWCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Oakmark Equity and Income Fund (OAKBX) is 3.16%, while T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX) has a volatility of 3.64%. This indicates that OAKBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRWCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| OAKBX | PRWCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.16% | 3.64% | -0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.55% | 9.78% | -3.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.82% | 13.57% | -1.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.17% | 13.24% | -1.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.05% | 12.98% | +0.07% |