PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NXST vs. HIFS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NXST vs. HIFS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nexstar Media Group, Inc. (NXST) and Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NXST achieves a -4.52% return, which is significantly lower than HIFS's 1.15% return. Over the past 10 years, NXST has outperformed HIFS with an annualized return of 17.56%, while HIFS has yielded a comparatively lower 9.36% annualized return.


NXST

1D
-0.99%
1M
5.21%
6M
-8.71%
YTD
-4.52%
1Y
6.98%
3Y*
5.54%
5Y*
8.78%
10Y*
17.56%
ALL TIME*
14.09%

HIFS

1D
0.78%
1M
-10.09%
6M
-4.24%
YTD
1.15%
1Y
20.34%
3Y*
9.15%
5Y*
0.14%
10Y*
9.36%
ALL TIME*
15.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$14.94M$11.99M$9.04M
$52.61M$57.41M$71.32M

NXST vs. HIFS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NXST
Nexstar Media Group, Inc.
-4.52%33.95%5.04%-7.52%18.37%40.95%-4.42%51.93%2.65%25.89%
HIFS
Hingham Institution for Savings
1.15%12.82%31.87%-28.60%-33.55%95.96%4.68%7.17%-3.84%5.93%

Correlation

The correlation between NXST and HIFS is 0.14, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2003

0.15

The correlation between NXST and HIFS shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.34 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NXST:

$5.82B

HIFS:

$621.76M

EPS

NXST:

$5.37

HIFS:

$30.03

PE Ratio

NXST:

35.48

HIFS:

9.50

PEG Ratio

NXST:

8.67K

HIFS:

1.56

PS Ratio

NXST:

1.15

HIFS:

2.57

Total Revenue (TTM)

NXST:

$5.11B

HIFS:

$245.42M

Gross Profit (TTM)

NXST:

$1.65B

HIFS:

$119.80M

EBITDA (TTM)

NXST:

$1.42B

HIFS:

$88.31M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NXST vs. HIFS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NXST
NXST Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
NXST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NXST Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
NXST Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
NXST Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
NXST Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

HIFS
HIFS Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
HIFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIFS Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
HIFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIFS Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NXST vs. HIFS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nexstar Media Group, Inc. (NXST) and Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NXSTHIFSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.11

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.14

0.85

-0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.34

1.63

-1.29

NXST vs. HIFS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NXST Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is lower than the HIFS Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NXST and HIFS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NXST vs. HIFS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NXST drawdown since its inception was -96.66%, which is greater than HIFS's maximum drawdown of -64.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NXST and HIFS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NXSTHIFSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.66%

-64.79%

-31.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.43%

-21.14%

-17.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.43%

-33.99%

-4.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.43%

-64.79%

+26.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.56%

-64.79%

+0.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.17%

-30.46%

+6.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.29%

-15.67%

-14.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.22%

10.95%

+5.27%

Volatility

NXST vs. HIFS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nexstar Media Group, Inc. (NXST) is 7.98%, while Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS) has a volatility of 9.64%. This indicates that NXST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HIFS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NXSTHIFSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.98%

9.64%

-1.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.56%

25.45%

+4.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.15%

44.19%

-9.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.75%

38.70%

-3.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.77%

34.68%

+5.09%

Dividends

NXST vs. HIFS - Dividend Comparison

NXST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, more than HIFS's 1.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HIFS
Hingham Institution for Savings
1.13%0.89%0.74%1.30%1.10%0.67%1.61%0.73%0.70%0.63%0.62%1.79%
NXST
Nexstar Media Group, Inc.
3.90%3.66%4.28%3.44%2.06%1.85%2.05%1.54%1.91%1.53%1.52%1.29%

Financials

NXST vs. HIFS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nexstar Media Group, Inc. and Hingham Institution for Savings. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

NXST vs. HIFS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Nexstar Media Group, Inc. and Hingham Institution for Savings over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

NXST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Nexstar Media Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

HIFS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hingham Institution for Savings reported a gross profit of 42.21M and revenue of 71.99M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.6%.

NXST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Nexstar Media Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 265.00M and revenue of 1.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.0%.

HIFS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hingham Institution for Savings reported an operating income of 33.44M and revenue of 71.99M, resulting in an operating margin of 46.5%.

NXST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Nexstar Media Group, Inc. reported a net income of 164.00M and revenue of 1.40B, resulting in a net margin of 11.8%.

HIFS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hingham Institution for Savings reported a net income of 25.44M and revenue of 71.99M, resulting in a net margin of 35.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NXST and HIFS have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HIFS has higher volatility (9.64%) compared to NXST (7.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NXST dropped -96.66% vs HIFS's -64.79%.

HIFS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.41 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NXST and HIFS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer