PortfoliosLab logo
NXST vs. HIFS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between NXST and HIFS is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

NXST vs. HIFS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nexstar Media Group, Inc. (NXST) and Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

NXST:

0.20

HIFS:

1.11

Sortino Ratio

NXST:

0.31

HIFS:

1.78

Omega Ratio

NXST:

1.04

HIFS:

1.21

Calmar Ratio

NXST:

0.06

HIFS:

0.72

Martin Ratio

NXST:

0.13

HIFS:

3.65

Ulcer Index

NXST:

11.42%

HIFS:

11.95%

Daily Std Dev

NXST:

34.69%

HIFS:

40.25%

Max Drawdown

NXST:

-96.66%

HIFS:

-64.79%

Current Drawdown

NXST:

-9.60%

HIFS:

-35.75%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NXST:

$5.31B

HIFS:

$587.80M

EPS

NXST:

$19.62

HIFS:

$12.95

PE Ratio

NXST:

8.98

HIFS:

20.81

PEG Ratio

NXST:

0.58

HIFS:

0.00

PS Ratio

NXST:

0.99

HIFS:

8.70

PB Ratio

NXST:

2.36

HIFS:

1.31

Total Revenue (TTM)

NXST:

$5.36B

HIFS:

$140.55M

Gross Profit (TTM)

NXST:

$3.13B

HIFS:

$165.12M

EBITDA (TTM)

NXST:

$2.12B

HIFS:

$38.71M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NXST achieves a 13.12% return, which is significantly higher than HIFS's 5.43% return. Over the past 10 years, NXST has outperformed HIFS with an annualized return of 15.07%, while HIFS has yielded a comparatively lower 9.99% annualized return.


NXST

YTD

13.12%

1M

19.93%

6M

10.42%

1Y

6.97%

5Y*

22.78%

10Y*

15.07%

HIFS

YTD

5.43%

1M

12.64%

6M

-2.19%

1Y

44.39%

5Y*

14.58%

10Y*

9.99%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

NXST vs. HIFS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NXST
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NXST is 5151
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NXST is 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NXST is 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NXST is 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NXST is 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NXST is 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

HIFS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HIFS is 8181
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HIFS is 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HIFS is 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HIFS is 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HIFS is 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HIFS is 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

NXST vs. HIFS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nexstar Media Group, Inc. (NXST) and Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current NXST Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is lower than the HIFS Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NXST and HIFS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

NXST vs. HIFS - Dividend Comparison

NXST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, more than HIFS's 0.95% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
NXST
Nexstar Media Group, Inc.
2.97%4.28%3.44%2.06%1.85%2.05%1.54%1.91%1.53%1.52%1.29%1.16%
HIFS
Hingham Institution for Savings
0.95%0.74%1.30%1.10%0.67%1.61%0.97%0.87%0.78%0.77%1.79%1.57%

Drawdowns

NXST vs. HIFS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NXST drawdown since its inception was -96.66%, which is greater than HIFS's maximum drawdown of -64.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NXST and HIFS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

NXST vs. HIFS - Volatility Comparison

Nexstar Media Group, Inc. (NXST) has a higher volatility of 9.41% compared to Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS) at 8.85%. This indicates that NXST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HIFS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

NXST vs. HIFS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nexstar Media Group, Inc. and Hingham Institution for Savings. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20212022202320242025
1.23B
51.36M
(NXST) Total Revenue
(HIFS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items