PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NWG.L vs. MSTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

NWG.L vs. MSTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in NatWest Group plc (NWG.L) and MicroStrategy Incorporated (MSTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NWG.L vs. MSTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NWG.L
NatWest Group plc
-11.62%71.03%95.51%-11.95%22.09%38.61%-30.23%24.47%-21.41%23.78%
MSTR
MicroStrategy Incorporated
-16.31%-51.27%366.55%323.85%-70.91%41.46%164.42%7.40%3.07%-39.24%
Different Trading Currencies

NWG.L is traded in GBp, while MSTR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MSTR values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NWG.L:

£44.80B

MSTR:

$36.69B

EPS

NWG.L:

£0.71

MSTR:

-$13.50

PS Ratio

NWG.L:

1.72

MSTR:

78.11

PB Ratio

NWG.L:

1.05

MSTR:

6.41

Total Revenue (TTM)

NWG.L:

£26.20B

MSTR:

$477.23M

Gross Profit (TTM)

NWG.L:

£16.48B

MSTR:

$327.82M

EBITDA (TTM)

NWG.L:

£8.56B

MSTR:

-$5.44B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NWG.L achieves a -11.62% return, which is significantly higher than MSTR's -16.31% return. Over the past 10 years, NWG.L has underperformed MSTR with an annualized return of 14.35%, while MSTR has yielded a comparatively higher 22.07% annualized return.


NWG.L

1D
1.43%
1M
-6.94%
YTD
-11.62%
6M
10.44%
1Y
29.85%
3Y*
36.04%
5Y*
29.88%
10Y*
14.35%

MSTR

1D
2.47%
1M
-1.73%
YTD
-16.31%
6M
-60.60%
1Y
-57.70%
3Y*
58.51%
5Y*
13.16%
10Y*
22.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NWG.L vs. MSTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NWG.L
NWG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
NWG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NWG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
NWG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
NWG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
NWG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

MSTR
MSTR Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
MSTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTR Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTR Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NWG.L vs. MSTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NatWest Group plc (NWG.L) and MicroStrategy Incorporated (MSTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NWG.LMSTRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.03

-0.79

+1.81

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.42

-1.18

+2.61

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

0.87

+0.33

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.26

-0.75

+2.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.83

-1.32

+5.15

NWG.L vs. MSTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NWG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is higher than the MSTR Sharpe Ratio of -0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NWG.L and MSTR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NWG.LMSTRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.03

-0.79

+1.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

0.15

+0.88

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.31

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.00

0.27

-0.27

Correlation

The correlation between NWG.L and MSTR is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

NWG.L vs. MSTR - Dividend Comparison

NWG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.87%, while MSTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
NWG.L
NatWest Group plc
5.87%3.84%4.35%7.06%10.35%2.66%0.00%10.40%0.92%
MSTR
MicroStrategy Incorporated
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

NWG.L vs. MSTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NWG.L drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than MSTR's maximum drawdown of -87.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWG.L and MSTR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NWG.LMSTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-99.86%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.06%

-76.53%

+54.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.51%

-84.11%

+44.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.08%

-89.27%

+24.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-84.98%

-73.66%

-11.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.46%

-86.60%

+41.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.27%

43.98%

-36.71%

Volatility

NWG.L vs. MSTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NatWest Group plc (NWG.L) is 8.65%, while MicroStrategy Incorporated (MSTR) has a volatility of 17.92%. This indicates that NWG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NWG.LMSTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.65%

17.92%

-9.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.75%

54.48%

-33.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.01%

73.34%

-44.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.95%

89.79%

-60.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.50%

72.23%

-38.73%

Financials

NWG.L vs. MSTR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NatWest Group plc and MicroStrategy Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
7.61B
122.99M
(NWG.L) Total Revenue
(MSTR) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. NWG.L values in GBp, MSTR values in USD