PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
NVHE.TO vs. ZUT.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

NVHE.TO vs. ZUT.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Harvest NVIDIA Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (NVHE.TO) and BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF (ZUT.TO).

NVHE.TO and ZUT.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NVHE.TO is an actively managed fund by Harvest. It was launched on Aug 19, 2024. ZUT.TO is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Index. It was launched on Jan 19, 2010.

Performance

NVHE.TO vs. ZUT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest NVIDIA Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (NVHE.TO) and BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF (ZUT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NVHE.TO vs. ZUT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024
NVHE.TO
Harvest NVIDIA Enhanced High Income Shares ETF		-5.86%31.47%10.09%
ZUT.TO
BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF		15.64%15.25%8.11%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVHE.TO achieves a -5.86% return, which is significantly lower than ZUT.TO's 15.64% return.

NVHE.TO

1D
3.81%
1M
-1.61%
YTD
-5.86%
6M
-4.04%
1Y
58.71%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

ZUT.TO

1D
0.73%
1M
3.27%
YTD
15.64%
6M
14.44%
1Y
28.59%
3Y*
11.46%
5Y*
6.39%
10Y*
10.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Harvest NVIDIA Enhanced High Income Shares ETF

BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF

Often compared with NVHE.TO:
NVHE.TO vs. NVDANVHE.TO vs. YNVD.NEONVHE.TO vs. NVDA.TONVHE.TO vs. PLTE.TONVHE.TO vs. HHIS.TONVHE.TO vs. NVIINVHE.TO vs. XEQT.TO
Often compared with ZUT.TO:
ZUT.TO vs. XUT.TOZUT.TO vs. ZWU.TOZUT.TO vs. ZLB.TOZUT.TO vs. VDY.TOZUT.TO vs. XMA.TOZUT.TO vs. XDIV.TOZUT.TO vs. ZWC.TO

NVHE.TO vs. ZUT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVHE.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than ZUT.TO's 0.61% expense ratio.

ZUT.TO
BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF
NVHE.TO
Harvest NVIDIA Enhanced High Income Shares ETF

Return for Risk

NVHE.TO vs. ZUT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
NVHE.TO
NVHE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
NVHE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVHE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVHE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
NVHE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVHE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
ZUT.TO
ZUT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ZUT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZUT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZUT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
ZUT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZUT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVHE.TO vs. ZUT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest NVIDIA Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (NVHE.TO) and BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF (ZUT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

NVHE.TOZUT.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.32

2.43

-1.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.94

3.13

-1.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.49

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

3.23

-0.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.37

8.12

-0.75

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NVHE.TO vs. ZUT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVHE.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is lower than the ZUT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVHE.TO and ZUT.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

NVHE.TOZUT.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

2.43

-1.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

0.46

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.63

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.57

-0.14

Correlation

The correlation between NVHE.TO and ZUT.TO is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

NVHE.TO vs. ZUT.TO - Dividend Comparison

NVHE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.49%, more than ZUT.TO's 2.92% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NVHE.TO
Harvest NVIDIA Enhanced High Income Shares ETF		22.49%21.62%7.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZUT.TO
BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF		2.92%3.44%3.98%4.35%3.95%3.25%3.31%4.00%4.59%3.71%3.98%4.63%

Drawdowns

NVHE.TO vs. ZUT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVHE.TO drawdown since its inception was -40.87%, which is greater than ZUT.TO's maximum drawdown of -37.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVHE.TO and ZUT.TO.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

NVHE.TOZUT.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.87%

-37.08%

-3.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.41%

-8.96%

-9.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-32.42%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-37.08%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.30%

0.00%

-15.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.09%

-6.37%

-3.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.92%

3.56%

+4.36%

Volatility

NVHE.TO vs. ZUT.TO - Volatility Comparison

Harvest NVIDIA Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (NVHE.TO) has a higher volatility of 10.94% compared to BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF (ZUT.TO) at 4.76%. This indicates that NVHE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZUT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

NVHE.TOZUT.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.94%

4.76%

+6.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.93%

8.47%

+18.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.81%

11.83%

+32.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.21%

13.91%

+36.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.21%

16.48%

+33.73%