NULG vs. TISCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF (NULG) and TIAA-CREF Social Choice Equity Fund (TISCX).
NULG is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the MSCI TIAA ESG USA Large Cap Growth. It was launched on Dec 13, 2016. TISCX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Jul 1, 1999.
Performance
NULG vs. TISCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NULG vs. TISCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NULG Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF | -7.01% | 14.07% | 23.75% | 42.71% | -28.43% | 28.06% | 39.58% | 39.23% | 0.31% | 24.57% |
TISCX TIAA-CREF Social Choice Equity Fund | -5.91% | 16.51% | 18.23% | 22.53% | -17.80% | 26.54% | 20.34% | 31.55% | -5.74% | 19.01% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NULG achieves a -7.01% return, which is significantly lower than TISCX's -5.91% return.
NULG
- 1D
- 3.87%
- 1M
- -4.51%
- YTD
- -7.01%
- 6M
- -8.45%
- 1Y
- 16.31%
- 3Y*
- 18.00%
- 5Y*
- 10.39%
- 10Y*
- —
TISCX
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -7.34%
- YTD
- -5.91%
- 6M
- -4.09%
- 1Y
- 13.20%
- 3Y*
- 14.50%
- 5Y*
- 9.03%
- 10Y*
- 12.53%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NULG vs. TISCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NULG has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than TISCX's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
NULG vs. TISCX — Risk / Return Rank
NULG
TISCX
NULG vs. TISCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF (NULG) and TIAA-CREF Social Choice Equity Fund (TISCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NULG | TISCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.74 | 0.78 | -0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.20 | 1.22 | -0.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.17 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | 1.03 | +0.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.82 | 4.59 | -0.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NULG | TISCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 | 0.78 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.47 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.39 | +0.39 |
Correlation
The correlation between NULG and TISCX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NULG vs. TISCX - Dividend Comparison
NULG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than TISCX's 8.24% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NULG Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.12% | 0.11% | 0.16% | 0.43% | 0.40% | 5.08% | 2.68% | 1.10% | 3.73% | 0.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TISCX TIAA-CREF Social Choice Equity Fund | 8.24% | 7.75% | 16.74% | 5.64% | 4.99% | 9.46% | 1.38% | 4.84% | 9.85% | 2.38% | 6.84% | 3.51% |
Drawdowns
NULG vs. TISCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NULG drawdown since its inception was -36.17%, smaller than the maximum TISCX drawdown of -54.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NULG and TISCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NULG | TISCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.17% | -54.65% | +18.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.50% | -11.07% | -3.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.17% | -28.29% | -7.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.19% | -9.71% | -1.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.93% | -10.15% | +3.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.28% | 2.50% | +1.78% |
Volatility
NULG vs. TISCX - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF (NULG) has a higher volatility of 7.12% compared to TIAA-CREF Social Choice Equity Fund (TISCX) at 4.32%. This indicates that NULG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TISCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NULG | TISCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.12% | 4.32% | +2.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.52% | 9.91% | +3.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.23% | 17.92% | +4.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.47% | 19.28% | +2.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.46% | 19.35% | +2.11% |