NUBF.TO vs. HAF.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about NBI Unconstrained Fixed Income ETF (NUBF.TO) and Global X Active Global Fixed Income ETF (HAF.TO).
NUBF.TO and HAF.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NUBF.TO is an actively managed fund by National Bank Investments. It was launched on Oct 18, 2019. HAF.TO is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Jul 20, 2009.
Performance
NUBF.TO vs. HAF.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NUBF.TO vs. HAF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUBF.TO NBI Unconstrained Fixed Income ETF | -1.28% | 6.66% | 1.49% | 5.75% | -6.23% | 0.36% | 6.24% | 0.22% |
HAF.TO Global X Active Global Fixed Income ETF | 0.10% | 2.56% | 3.65% | 10.92% | -6.00% | 1.88% | 2.75% | 1.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NUBF.TO achieves a -1.28% return, which is significantly lower than HAF.TO's 0.10% return.
NUBF.TO
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- -3.32%
- YTD
- -1.28%
- 6M
- -1.13%
- 1Y
- 4.26%
- 3Y*
- 3.58%
- 5Y*
- 1.19%
- 10Y*
- —
HAF.TO
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -1.49%
- YTD
- 0.10%
- 6M
- 0.50%
- 1Y
- 0.90%
- 3Y*
- 5.00%
- 5Y*
- 2.46%
- 10Y*
- 2.99%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NUBF.TO vs. HAF.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUBF.TO has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than HAF.TO's 0.59% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NUBF.TO vs. HAF.TO — Risk / Return Rank
NUBF.TO
HAF.TO
NUBF.TO vs. HAF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NBI Unconstrained Fixed Income ETF (NUBF.TO) and Global X Active Global Fixed Income ETF (HAF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NUBF.TO | HAF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.71 | 0.13 | +0.59 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.06 | 0.23 | +0.83 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.03 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.89 | 0.34 | +0.56 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.77 | 0.74 | +3.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NUBF.TO | HAF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 | 0.13 | +0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.35 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.19 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between NUBF.TO and HAF.TO is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
NUBF.TO vs. HAF.TO - Dividend Comparison
NUBF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.56%, less than HAF.TO's 5.01% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUBF.TO NBI Unconstrained Fixed Income ETF | 4.56% | 4.45% | 4.35% | 3.99% | 11.20% | 4.23% | 1.72% | 0.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HAF.TO Global X Active Global Fixed Income ETF | 5.01% | 5.05% | 5.47% | 5.34% | 4.36% | 2.41% | 3.08% | 3.23% | 2.82% | 3.11% | 3.98% | 3.84% |
Drawdowns
NUBF.TO vs. HAF.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUBF.TO drawdown since its inception was -16.37%, smaller than the maximum HAF.TO drawdown of -28.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUBF.TO and HAF.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUBF.TO | HAF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.37% | -28.04% | +11.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.66% | -3.87% | -0.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.37% | -12.30% | -0.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.32% | -2.23% | -1.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.33% | -4.07% | +0.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.10% | 1.76% | -0.66% |
Volatility
NUBF.TO vs. HAF.TO - Volatility Comparison
NBI Unconstrained Fixed Income ETF (NUBF.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.01% compared to Global X Active Global Fixed Income ETF (HAF.TO) at 2.32%. This indicates that NUBF.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HAF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NUBF.TO | HAF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.01% | 2.32% | +0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.69% | 5.24% | -0.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.01% | 7.18% | -1.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.00% | 7.18% | -0.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.47% | 11.13% | +0.34% |