PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
NU vs. METC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

NU vs. METC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU) and Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
36.11%
43.82%
NU
METC

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NU achieves a 68.79% return, which is significantly higher than METC's -27.21% return.


NU

YTD

68.79%

1M

-0.35%

6M

20.58%

1Y

79.11%

5Y (annualized)

N/A

10Y (annualized)

N/A

METC

YTD

-27.21%

1M

10.56%

6M

-6.72%

1Y

-24.23%

5Y (annualized)

39.86%

10Y (annualized)

N/A

Fundamentals


NUMETC
Market Cap$75.86B$609.99M
EPS$0.31$0.64
PE Ratio51.1018.48
Total Revenue (TTM)$7.18B$698.13M
Gross Profit (TTM)$5.01B$146.75M
EBITDA (TTM)$1.92B$102.38M

Key characteristics


NUMETC
Sharpe Ratio1.95-0.49
Sortino Ratio2.55-0.38
Omega Ratio1.320.95
Calmar Ratio2.14-0.52
Martin Ratio12.54-0.85
Ulcer Index5.75%35.14%
Daily Std Dev36.94%61.39%
Max Drawdown-72.07%-85.53%
Current Drawdown-11.52%-44.17%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.1

The correlation between NU and METC is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

NU vs. METC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU) and Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for NU, currently valued at 1.95, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.001.95-0.49
The chart of Sortino ratio for NU, currently valued at 2.55, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.55-0.38
The chart of Omega ratio for NU, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.320.95
The chart of Calmar ratio for NU, currently valued at 2.14, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.14-0.52
The chart of Martin ratio for NU, currently valued at 12.54, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0012.54-0.85
NU
METC

The current NU Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is higher than the METC Sharpe Ratio of -0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NU and METC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.95
-0.49
NU
METC

Dividends

NU vs. METC - Dividend Comparison

NU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while METC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%.


TTM20232022
NU
Nu Holdings Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%
METC
Ramaco Resources, Inc.
4.44%2.91%6.29%

Drawdowns

NU vs. METC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NU drawdown since its inception was -72.07%, smaller than the maximum METC drawdown of -85.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NU and METC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-11.52%
-44.17%
NU
METC

Volatility

NU vs. METC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU) is 13.25%, while Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC) has a volatility of 18.99%. This indicates that NU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than METC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
13.25%
18.99%
NU
METC

Financials

NU vs. METC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nu Holdings Ltd. and Ramaco Resources, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items