NU vs. FAT

In the year-to-date period, NU achieves a 15.93% return, which is significantly higher than FAT's -9.58% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU) and FAT Brands Inc. (FAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current NU Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is higher than the FAT Sharpe Ratio of -0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NU and FAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

NU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.74%.

The maximum NU drawdown since its inception was -72.07%, smaller than the maximum FAT drawdown of -78.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NU and FAT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU) is 17.67%, while FAT Brands Inc. (FAT) has a volatility of 22.06%. This indicates that NU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nu Holdings Ltd. and FAT Brands Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.