PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
NU vs. FAT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between NU and FAT is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.1

Performance

NU vs. FAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU) and FAT Brands Inc. (FAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-40.00%-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
0.48%
-34.10%
NU
FAT

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

NU:

0.71

FAT:

-0.17

Sortino Ratio

NU:

1.18

FAT:

0.12

Omega Ratio

NU:

1.15

FAT:

1.02

Calmar Ratio

NU:

0.80

FAT:

-0.14

Martin Ratio

NU:

3.06

FAT:

-0.25

Ulcer Index

NU:

9.20%

FAT:

33.48%

Daily Std Dev

NU:

39.78%

FAT:

49.93%

Max Drawdown

NU:

-72.07%

FAT:

-81.65%

Current Drawdown

NU:

-34.68%

FAT:

-48.12%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NU:

$56.24B

FAT:

$92.83M

EPS

NU:

$0.37

FAT:

-$9.22

Total Revenue (TTM)

NU:

$10.71B

FAT:

$606.01M

Gross Profit (TTM)

NU:

$5.39B

FAT:

$164.54M

EBITDA (TTM)

NU:

$2.66B

FAT:

$26.08M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NU achieves a 24.61% return, which is significantly higher than FAT's -2.21% return.


NU

YTD

24.61%

1M

-22.07%

6M

-15.27%

1Y

26.12%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

FAT

YTD

-2.21%

1M

2.27%

6M

6.46%

1Y

-5.33%

5Y*

28.71%

10Y*

N/A

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

NU vs. FAT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU) and FAT Brands Inc. (FAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for NU, currently valued at 0.71, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.000.71-0.17
The chart of Sortino ratio for NU, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.180.12
The chart of Omega ratio for NU, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.151.02
The chart of Calmar ratio for NU, currently valued at 0.80, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.80-0.16
The chart of Martin ratio for NU, currently valued at 3.06, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.003.06-0.25
NU
FAT

The current NU Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is higher than the FAT Sharpe Ratio of -0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NU and FAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
0.71
-0.17
NU
FAT

Dividends

NU vs. FAT - Dividend Comparison

NU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.37%.


TTM202320222021202020192018
NU
Nu Holdings Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FAT
FAT Brands Inc.
10.37%9.24%10.92%4.91%0.00%6.37%18.88%

Drawdowns

NU vs. FAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NU drawdown since its inception was -72.07%, smaller than the maximum FAT drawdown of -81.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NU and FAT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-34.68%
-41.26%
NU
FAT

Volatility

NU vs. FAT - Volatility Comparison

Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU) has a higher volatility of 16.66% compared to FAT Brands Inc. (FAT) at 7.85%. This indicates that NU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
16.66%
7.85%
NU
FAT

Financials

NU vs. FAT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nu Holdings Ltd. and FAT Brands Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab