PortfoliosLab logo
NU vs. FAT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between NU and FAT is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

NU vs. FAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU) and FAT Brands Inc. (FAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

NU:

0.18

FAT:

-0.15

Sortino Ratio

NU:

0.73

FAT:

0.26

Omega Ratio

NU:

1.10

FAT:

1.03

Calmar Ratio

NU:

0.39

FAT:

-0.07

Martin Ratio

NU:

0.80

FAT:

-0.26

Ulcer Index

NU:

19.28%

FAT:

16.79%

Daily Std Dev

NU:

48.30%

FAT:

52.18%

Max Drawdown

NU:

-72.07%

FAT:

-81.65%

Current Drawdown

NU:

-17.37%

FAT:

-53.61%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NU:

$65.08B

FAT:

$48.20M

EPS

NU:

$0.44

FAT:

-$11.96

PS Ratio

NU:

11.53

FAT:

0.08

PB Ratio

NU:

7.56

FAT:

12.81

Total Revenue (TTM)

NU:

$11.46B

FAT:

$142.46B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NU:

$5.32B

FAT:

$46.04B

EBITDA (TTM)

NU:

$3.06B

FAT:

-$68.82B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NU achieves a 26.74% return, which is significantly higher than FAT's -9.24% return.


NU

YTD

26.74%

1M

21.13%

6M

-13.56%

1Y

8.60%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

FAT

YTD

-9.24%

1M

6.32%

6M

-9.92%

1Y

-7.91%

5Y*

38.61%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

NU vs. FAT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NU is 6161
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NU is 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NU is 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NU is 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NU is 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NU is 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

FAT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FAT is 4444
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FAT is 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FAT is 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FAT is 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FAT is 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FAT is 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

NU vs. FAT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU) and FAT Brands Inc. (FAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current NU Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is higher than the FAT Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NU and FAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

NU vs. FAT - Dividend Comparison

NU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.80%.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018
NU
Nu Holdings Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FAT
FAT Brands Inc.
5.80%10.53%9.24%10.92%4.66%0.00%6.37%18.89%

Drawdowns

NU vs. FAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NU drawdown since its inception was -72.07%, smaller than the maximum FAT drawdown of -81.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NU and FAT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

NU vs. FAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU) is 8.32%, while FAT Brands Inc. (FAT) has a volatility of 18.62%. This indicates that NU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

NU vs. FAT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nu Holdings Ltd. and FAT Brands Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B20212022202320242025
2.86B
142.02B
(NU) Total Revenue
(FAT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NU vs. FAT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Nu Holdings Ltd. and FAT Brands Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
45.7%
32.3%
(NU) Gross Margin
(FAT) Gross Margin
NU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Nu Holdings Ltd. reported a gross profit of 1.31B and revenue of 2.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.7%.

FAT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, FAT Brands Inc. reported a gross profit of 45.92B and revenue of 142.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.3%.

NU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Nu Holdings Ltd. reported an operating income of 767.45M and revenue of 2.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.9%.

FAT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, FAT Brands Inc. reported an operating income of -8.57B and revenue of 142.02B, resulting in an operating margin of -6.0%.

NU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Nu Holdings Ltd. reported a net income of 552.64M and revenue of 2.86B, resulting in a net margin of 19.3%.

FAT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, FAT Brands Inc. reported a net income of -45.97B and revenue of 142.02B, resulting in a net margin of -32.4%.