PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
NU vs. CSPX.L
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


NUCSPX.L
YTD Return32.65%6.83%
1Y Return118.81%25.92%
Sharpe Ratio3.452.26
Daily Std Dev35.84%11.45%
Max Drawdown-72.07%-33.90%
Current Drawdown-9.80%-3.00%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between NU and CSPX.L is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

NU vs. CSPX.L - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, NU achieves a 32.65% return, which is significantly higher than CSPX.L's 6.83% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
6.97%
12.09%
NU
CSPX.L

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Nu Holdings Ltd.

iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

Risk-Adjusted Performance

NU vs. CSPX.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NU
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for NU, currently valued at 3.13, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.003.13
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for NU, currently valued at 3.75, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.75
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for NU, currently valued at 1.48, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.48
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for NU, currently valued at 2.06, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.06
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for NU, currently valued at 16.63, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0016.63
CSPX.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CSPX.L, currently valued at 2.42, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.002.42
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CSPX.L, currently valued at 3.50, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.50
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CSPX.L, currently valued at 1.45, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.45
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CSPX.L, currently valued at 2.13, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.13
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CSPX.L, currently valued at 9.50, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.009.50

NU vs. CSPX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NU Sharpe Ratio is 3.45, which is higher than the CSPX.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of NU and CSPX.L.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.002.003.004.005.00NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
3.13
2.42
NU
CSPX.L

Dividends

NU vs. CSPX.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither NU nor CSPX.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

NU vs. CSPX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NU drawdown since its inception was -72.07%, which is greater than CSPX.L's maximum drawdown of -33.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NU and CSPX.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-9.80%
-3.00%
NU
CSPX.L

Volatility

NU vs. CSPX.L - Volatility Comparison

Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU) has a higher volatility of 6.79% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L) at 3.90%. This indicates that NU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSPX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
6.79%
3.90%
NU
CSPX.L