PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
NTB vs. SCHG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between NTB and SCHG is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.4

Performance

NTB vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

100.00%150.00%200.00%250.00%300.00%350.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
129.83%
268.46%
NTB
SCHG

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

NTB:

1.08

SCHG:

0.22

Sortino Ratio

NTB:

1.65

SCHG:

0.48

Omega Ratio

NTB:

1.21

SCHG:

1.07

Calmar Ratio

NTB:

1.21

SCHG:

0.23

Martin Ratio

NTB:

4.56

SCHG:

0.88

Ulcer Index

NTB:

6.26%

SCHG:

6.18%

Daily Std Dev

NTB:

26.44%

SCHG:

24.57%

Max Drawdown

NTB:

-69.74%

SCHG:

-34.59%

Current Drawdown

NTB:

-8.22%

SCHG:

-18.51%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NTB achieves a 3.73% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's -14.91% return.


NTB

YTD

3.73%

1M

-2.80%

6M

-0.93%

1Y

29.15%

5Y*

22.05%

10Y*

N/A

SCHG

YTD

-14.91%

1M

-7.40%

6M

-10.61%

1Y

6.90%

5Y*

16.81%

10Y*

14.20%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

NTB vs. SCHG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NTB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NTB is 8484
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NTB is 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NTB is 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NTB is 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NTB is 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NTB is 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SCHG is 4949
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SCHG is 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SCHG is 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SCHG is 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SCHG is 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SCHG is 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

NTB vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for NTB, currently valued at 1.08, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
NTB: 1.08
SCHG: 0.22
The chart of Sortino ratio for NTB, currently valued at 1.65, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
NTB: 1.65
SCHG: 0.48
The chart of Omega ratio for NTB, currently valued at 1.21, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
NTB: 1.21
SCHG: 1.07
The chart of Calmar ratio for NTB, currently valued at 1.21, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.00
NTB: 1.21
SCHG: 0.23
The chart of Martin ratio for NTB, currently valued at 4.56, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00
NTB: 4.56
SCHG: 0.88

The current NTB Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTB and SCHG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
1.08
0.22
NTB
SCHG

Dividends

NTB vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

NTB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, more than SCHG's 0.48% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
NTB
The Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited
4.70%4.82%5.50%5.90%4.62%5.65%4.75%4.85%3.53%0.32%0.00%0.00%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.48%0.40%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%1.09%

Drawdowns

NTB vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTB drawdown since its inception was -69.74%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTB and SCHG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-8.22%
-18.51%
NTB
SCHG

Volatility

NTB vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) is 9.62%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 15.88%. This indicates that NTB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
9.62%
15.88%
NTB
SCHG
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab