PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
NTB vs. SCHG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


NTBSCHG
YTD Return14.50%12.87%
1Y Return56.87%40.41%
3Y Return (Ann)2.37%12.26%
5Y Return (Ann)4.12%18.88%
10Y Return (Ann)18.62%16.06%
Sharpe Ratio2.062.60
Daily Std Dev29.03%15.77%
Max Drawdown-97.62%-34.59%
Current Drawdown-89.90%0.00%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between NTB and SCHG is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

NTB vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, NTB achieves a 14.50% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 12.87% return. Over the past 10 years, NTB has outperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 18.62%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively lower 16.06% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%200.00%400.00%600.00%800.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
9.70%
745.38%
NTB
SCHG

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


The Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF

Risk-Adjusted Performance

NTB vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NTB
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for NTB, currently valued at 2.06, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.002.06
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for NTB, currently valued at 2.98, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.98
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for NTB, currently valued at 1.34, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.34
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for NTB, currently valued at 1.42, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.42
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for NTB, currently valued at 6.48, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.006.48
SCHG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SCHG, currently valued at 2.60, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.002.60
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SCHG, currently valued at 3.50, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.50
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SCHG, currently valued at 1.45, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.45
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SCHG, currently valued at 2.14, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.14
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SCHG, currently valued at 13.62, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.0013.62

NTB vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTB Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which roughly equals the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of NTB and SCHG.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
2.06
2.60
NTB
SCHG

Dividends

NTB vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

NTB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.93%, more than SCHG's 0.43% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
NTB
The Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited
4.93%5.50%5.90%4.62%5.65%4.75%4.85%3.53%0.95%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.43%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%0.82%1.22%1.09%1.07%

Drawdowns

NTB vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTB drawdown since its inception was -97.62%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTB and SCHG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-8.38%
0
NTB
SCHG

Volatility

NTB vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

The Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) has a higher volatility of 6.26% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 5.03%. This indicates that NTB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
6.26%
5.03%
NTB
SCHG