NTB vs. META

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about The Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META).

Performance

NTB vs. META - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NTB vs. META - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NTB The Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited	6.33%	42.51%	20.23%	14.28%	-17.47%	28.34%	-10.09%	24.14%	-10.70%	19.79%
META Meta Platforms, Inc.	-13.25%	13.09%	66.05%	194.13%	-64.22%	23.13%	33.09%	56.57%	-25.71%	53.38%

Fundamentals

Market Cap NTB : $2.17B META : $1.47T
EPS NTB : $5.52 META : $23.51
PE Ratio NTB : 9.51 META : 24.34
PEG Ratio NTB : 0.64 META : 1.00
PS Ratio NTB : 2.92 META : 7.32
PB Ratio NTB : 1.90 META : 6.78
Total Revenue (TTM) NTB : $756.09M META : $200.97B
Gross Profit (TTM) NTB : $606.82M META : $164.79B
EBITDA (TTM) NTB : $267.42M META : $104.55B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NTB achieves a 6.33% return, which is significantly higher than META's -13.25% return.

NTB

• 1D: 1.37%
• 1M: 3.41%
• YTD: 6.33%
• 6M: 24.79%
• 1Y: 40.68%
• 3Y*: 31.44%
• 5Y*: 12.31%
• 10Y*: —

META

• 1D: 6.67%
• 1M: -11.66%
• YTD: -13.25%
• 6M: -21.96%
• 1Y: -0.42%
• 3Y*: 39.60%
• 5Y*: 14.06%
• 10Y*: 17.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

NTB vs. META — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NTB

NTB Risk / Return Rank: 89
NTB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
NTB Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
NTB Omega Ratio Rank: 86
NTB Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
NTB Martin Ratio Rank: 90

META

META Risk / Return Rank: 40
META Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
META Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
META Omega Ratio Rank: 37
META Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
META Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NTB vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NTB	META	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.95	-0.01	+1.96
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.64	0.29	+2.35
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.04	+0.30
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.63	-0.01	+3.65
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.49	-0.04	+10.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NTB vs. META - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTB Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is higher than the META Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTB and META, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NTB	META	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.95	-0.01	+1.96
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43	0.32	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.45	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.55	-0.16

Correlation

The correlation between NTB and META is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

NTB vs. META - Dividend Comparison

NTB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, more than META's 0.37% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
NTB The Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited	3.70%	3.77%	4.82%	5.50%	5.90%	4.62%	5.65%	4.75%	4.85%	3.53%	0.32%
META Meta Platforms, Inc.	0.37%	0.32%	0.34%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

NTB vs. META - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTB drawdown since its inception was -69.74%, smaller than the maximum META drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTB and META.

Drawdown Indicators

	NTB	META	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.74%	-76.74%	+7.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.44%	-33.30%	+21.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.96%	-76.74%	+36.78%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-76.74%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.30%	-27.41%	+26.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.07%	-15.19%	-3.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.96%	13.13%	-9.17%

Volatility

NTB vs. META - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) is 3.60%, while Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) has a volatility of 13.64%. This indicates that NTB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NTB	META	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.60%	13.64%	-10.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.74%	26.73%	-12.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.00%	39.91%	-18.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.90%	43.77%	-14.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.94%	38.46%	-3.52%

Financials

NTB vs. META - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited and Meta Platforms, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

NTB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited reported a gross profit of 159.10M and revenue of 159.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

META - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a gross profit of 48.99B and revenue of 59.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.8%.

NTB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited reported an operating income of 79.00M and revenue of 159.10M, resulting in an operating margin of 49.7%.

META - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported an operating income of 24.75B and revenue of 59.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 41.3%.

NTB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited reported a net income of 63.80M and revenue of 159.10M, resulting in a net margin of 40.1%.

META - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a net income of 22.77B and revenue of 59.89B, resulting in a net margin of 38.0%.