PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NTB vs. EWBC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NTB vs. EWBC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) and East West Bancorp, Inc. (EWBC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NTB achieves a 25.31% return, which is significantly higher than EWBC's 18.13% return.


NTB

1D
-0.71%
1M
2.71%
6M
20.52%
YTD
25.31%
1Y
42.73%
3Y*
31.99%
5Y*
19.00%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.79%

EWBC

1D
0.07%
1M
1.31%
6M
16.01%
YTD
18.13%
1Y
36.00%
3Y*
32.64%
5Y*
15.80%
10Y*
17.28%
ALL TIME*
14.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$112.82M$115.30M$117.41M
$10.70M$9.23M$11.58M

NTB vs. EWBC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NTB
The Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited
25.31%42.51%20.23%14.28%-17.47%28.34%-10.09%24.14%-10.70%19.79%
EWBC
East West Bancorp, Inc.
18.13%20.31%36.76%12.75%-14.44%57.98%7.23%14.34%-27.44%21.38%

Correlation

The correlation between NTB and EWBC is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016

0.68

The correlation between NTB and EWBC shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.70 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NTB:

$2.43B

EWBC:

$17.95B

EPS

NTB:

$5.73

EWBC:

$10.41

PE Ratio

NTB:

10.70

EWBC:

12.58

PEG Ratio

NTB:

0.72

EWBC:

1.02

PS Ratio

NTB:

3.49

EWBC:

6.90

PB Ratio

NTB:

2.16

EWBC:

1.96

Total Revenue (TTM)

NTB:

$719.37M

EWBC:

$2.64B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NTB:

$625.15M

EWBC:

$1.53B

EBITDA (TTM)

NTB:

$271.17M

EWBC:

$2.43B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NTB vs. EWBC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NTB
NTB Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
NTB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTB Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
NTB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTB Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

EWBC
EWBC Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
EWBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWBC Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
EWBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWBC Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NTB vs. EWBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) and East West Bancorp, Inc. (EWBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NTBEWBCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.24

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.92

2.18

+1.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.84

6.20

+6.64

NTB vs. EWBC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTB Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is higher than the EWBC Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTB and EWBC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NTB vs. EWBC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTB drawdown since its inception was -69.74%, smaller than the maximum EWBC drawdown of -92.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTB and EWBC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NTBEWBCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.74%

-92.14%

+22.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.32%

-15.71%

+5.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.64%

-35.77%

+17.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.96%

-54.06%

+14.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.84%

-3.78%

+1.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.46%

-22.71%

+4.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.15%

5.51%

-2.36%

Volatility

NTB vs. EWBC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) is 5.16%, while East West Bancorp, Inc. (EWBC) has a volatility of 5.86%. This indicates that NTB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NTBEWBCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.16%

5.86%

-0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.66%

17.02%

-3.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.73%

25.28%

-5.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.54%

35.90%

-7.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.53%

37.68%

-3.15%

Dividends

NTB vs. EWBC - Dividend Comparison

NTB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, more than EWBC's 2.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWBC
East West Bancorp, Inc.
2.14%2.14%2.30%2.67%2.43%1.68%2.17%2.17%1.98%1.32%1.57%1.92%
NTB
The Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited
3.26%3.77%4.82%5.50%5.90%4.62%5.65%4.75%4.85%3.53%0.32%0.00%

Financials

NTB vs. EWBC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited and East West Bancorp, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

NTB vs. EWBC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited and East West Bancorp, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

NTB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited reported a gross profit of 158.30M and revenue of 159.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 99.0%.

EWBC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, East West Bancorp, Inc. reported a gross profit of -738.95M and revenue of -950.22M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.8%.

NTB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited reported an operating income of 48.50M and revenue of 159.90M, resulting in an operating margin of 30.3%.

EWBC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, East West Bancorp, Inc. reported an operating income of -457.44M and revenue of -950.22M, resulting in an operating margin of 48.1%.

NTB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited reported a net income of 46.90M and revenue of 159.90M, resulting in a net margin of 29.3%.

EWBC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, East West Bancorp, Inc. reported a net income of 363.70M and revenue of -950.22M, resulting in a net margin of -38.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NTB and EWBC have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWBC has higher volatility (5.86%) compared to NTB (5.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTB dropped -69.74% vs EWBC's -92.14%.

NTB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NTB and EWBC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer