NSTLX vs. ETSIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Neuberger Berman Strategic Income Fund (NSTLX) and Eaton Vance Strategic Income Fund Class I (ETSIX).
NSTLX is managed by Neuberger Berman. It was launched on Jul 10, 2003. ETSIX is an actively managed fund by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Jan 23, 1998.
Performance
NSTLX vs. ETSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NSTLX vs. ETSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NSTLX Neuberger Berman Strategic Income Fund | -0.83% | 9.44% | 6.02% | 10.07% | -11.81% | 2.94% | 7.78% | 10.55% | -2.34% | 7.00% |
ETSIX Eaton Vance Strategic Income Fund Class I | 1.04% | 10.88% | 6.38% | 8.24% | -2.55% | 1.33% | 7.52% | 6.58% | -2.68% | 4.90% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NSTLX achieves a -0.83% return, which is significantly lower than ETSIX's 1.04% return. Over the past 10 years, NSTLX has underperformed ETSIX with an annualized return of 4.12%, while ETSIX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.71% annualized return.
NSTLX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -1.85%
- YTD
- -0.83%
- 6M
- 0.43%
- 1Y
- 5.82%
- 3Y*
- 6.77%
- 5Y*
- 2.77%
- 10Y*
- 4.12%
ETSIX
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -0.88%
- YTD
- 1.04%
- 6M
- 3.58%
- 1Y
- 9.25%
- 3Y*
- 7.96%
- 5Y*
- 4.80%
- 10Y*
- 4.71%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NSTLX vs. ETSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NSTLX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than ETSIX's 1.46% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NSTLX vs. ETSIX — Risk / Return Rank
NSTLX
ETSIX
NSTLX vs. ETSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Strategic Income Fund (NSTLX) and Eaton Vance Strategic Income Fund Class I (ETSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NSTLX | ETSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.63 | 3.20 | -1.57 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.35 | 4.53 | -2.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.72 | -0.41 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.80 | 3.94 | -2.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.33 | 15.04 | -7.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NSTLX | ETSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63 | 3.20 | -1.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 1.52 | -0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | 1.50 | -0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 1.34 | -0.47 |
Correlation
The correlation between NSTLX and ETSIX is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
NSTLX vs. ETSIX - Dividend Comparison
NSTLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.10%, less than ETSIX's 7.07% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NSTLX Neuberger Berman Strategic Income Fund | 5.10% | 5.46% | 5.31% | 5.38% | 3.92% | 6.29% | 3.81% | 4.02% | 4.33% | 3.64% | 3.54% | 4.09% |
ETSIX Eaton Vance Strategic Income Fund Class I | 7.07% | 5.65% | 6.97% | 6.93% | 5.56% | 4.31% | 4.19% | 4.29% | 3.98% | 3.70% | 3.94% | 4.32% |
Drawdowns
NSTLX vs. ETSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NSTLX drawdown since its inception was -19.00%, which is greater than ETSIX's maximum drawdown of -12.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSTLX and ETSIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NSTLX | ETSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.00% | -12.63% | -6.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.30% | -2.43% | -0.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.65% | -6.34% | -10.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.00% | -12.28% | -6.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.42% | -1.73% | -0.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.71% | -1.44% | -1.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.81% | 0.64% | +0.17% |
Volatility
NSTLX vs. ETSIX - Volatility Comparison
Neuberger Berman Strategic Income Fund (NSTLX) has a higher volatility of 1.61% compared to Eaton Vance Strategic Income Fund Class I (ETSIX) at 1.16%. This indicates that NSTLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NSTLX | ETSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.61% | 1.16% | +0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.32% | 1.91% | +0.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.60% | 3.00% | +0.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.00% | 3.16% | +1.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.96% | 3.15% | +1.81% |