PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOCT vs. BUFP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NOCT vs. BUFP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - October (NOCT) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NOCT vs. BUFP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NOCT
Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - October
-2.68%12.81%5.07%
BUFP
PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF
-1.34%12.92%6.36%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOCT achieves a -2.68% return, which is significantly lower than BUFP's -1.34% return.


NOCT

1D
1.91%
1M
-2.43%
YTD
-2.68%
6M
-0.78%
1Y
13.38%
3Y*
12.93%
5Y*
8.72%
10Y*

BUFP

1D
1.96%
1M
-2.04%
YTD
-1.34%
6M
1.19%
1Y
13.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NOCT vs. BUFP - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOCT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than BUFP's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

NOCT vs. BUFP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOCT
NOCT Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
NOCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOCT Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
NOCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOCT Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFP
BUFP Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
BUFP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFP Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFP Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOCT vs. BUFP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - October (NOCT) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NOCTBUFPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.07

1.23

-0.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.68

1.86

-0.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.31

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

1.71

-0.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.30

9.81

-1.51

NOCT vs. BUFP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOCT Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is comparable to the BUFP Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOCT and BUFP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NOCTBUFPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.07

1.23

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

1.02

-0.15

Correlation

The correlation between NOCT and BUFP is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

NOCT vs. BUFP - Dividend Comparison

NOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BUFP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
NOCT
Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.07%
BUFP
PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF
0.01%0.01%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

NOCT vs. BUFP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOCT drawdown since its inception was -16.21%, which is greater than BUFP's maximum drawdown of -11.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOCT and BUFP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NOCTBUFPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.21%

-11.98%

-4.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.08%

-8.16%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.04%

-2.54%

-1.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.39%

-1.08%

-1.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

1.42%

+0.18%

Volatility

NOCT vs. BUFP - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - October (NOCT) has a higher volatility of 3.69% compared to PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP) at 3.41%. This indicates that NOCT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NOCTBUFPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.69%

3.41%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.46%

4.99%

+1.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.54%

11.11%

+1.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.93%

9.79%

+1.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.29%

9.79%

+1.50%