PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NNRG.NEO vs. OILY.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NNRG.NEO vs. OILY.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Ninepoint Energy ETF (NNRG.NEO) and Evolve Canadian Energy Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF (OILY.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NNRG.NEO vs. OILY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
NNRG.NEO
Ninepoint Energy ETF
32.61%12.92%
OILY.TO
Evolve Canadian Energy Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF
27.92%3.96%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NNRG.NEO achieves a 32.61% return, which is significantly higher than OILY.TO's 27.92% return.


NNRG.NEO

1D
-3.69%
1M
12.20%
YTD
32.61%
6M
42.68%
1Y
47.71%
3Y*
21.15%
5Y*
10Y*

OILY.TO

1D
-2.89%
1M
6.10%
YTD
27.92%
6M
29.05%
1Y
34.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NNRG.NEO vs. OILY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

NNRG.NEO has a 1.79% expense ratio, which is higher than OILY.TO's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

NNRG.NEO vs. OILY.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NNRG.NEO
NNRG.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
NNRG.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NNRG.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
NNRG.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
NNRG.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
NNRG.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

OILY.TO
OILY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
OILY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OILY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
OILY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
OILY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
OILY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NNRG.NEO vs. OILY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ninepoint Energy ETF (NNRG.NEO) and Evolve Canadian Energy Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF (OILY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NNRG.NEOOILY.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.76

1.40

+0.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.21

1.82

+0.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.30

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

1.52

+0.89

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.37

5.48

+1.90

NNRG.NEO vs. OILY.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NNRG.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the OILY.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NNRG.NEO and OILY.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NNRG.NEOOILY.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.76

1.40

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.04

1.32

-0.29

Correlation

The correlation between NNRG.NEO and OILY.TO is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

NNRG.NEO vs. OILY.TO - Dividend Comparison

NNRG.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than OILY.TO's 12.73% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
NNRG.NEO
Ninepoint Energy ETF
0.56%0.37%0.39%0.38%9.08%1.92%
OILY.TO
Evolve Canadian Energy Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF
12.73%11.50%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

NNRG.NEO vs. OILY.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NNRG.NEO drawdown since its inception was -35.78%, which is greater than OILY.TO's maximum drawdown of -22.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NNRG.NEO and OILY.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NNRG.NEOOILY.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.78%

-22.70%

-13.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.22%

-22.70%

+2.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.78%

-4.18%

-0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.77%

-4.51%

-5.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.61%

6.29%

+0.32%

Volatility

NNRG.NEO vs. OILY.TO - Volatility Comparison

Ninepoint Energy ETF (NNRG.NEO) has a higher volatility of 7.33% compared to Evolve Canadian Energy Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF (OILY.TO) at 5.45%. This indicates that NNRG.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OILY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NNRG.NEOOILY.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.33%

5.45%

+1.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.41%

13.57%

+2.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.21%

24.73%

+2.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.50%

24.73%

+9.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.50%

24.73%

+9.77%