NLR vs. VTI
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI).
NLR and VTI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NLR is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the DAXglobal Nuclear Energy Index. It was launched on Aug 13, 2007. VTI is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the CRSP US Total Market Index. It was launched on May 24, 2001. Both NLR and VTI are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: NLR or VTI.
Performance
NLR vs. VTI - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NLR having a 22.62% return and VTI slightly higher at 23.63%. Over the past 10 years, NLR has underperformed VTI with an annualized return of 8.97%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively higher 12.59% annualized return.
NLR
22.62%
-6.88%
0.63%
26.23%
15.74%
8.97%
VTI
23.63%
0.87%
11.41%
32.34%
14.66%
12.59%
Key characteristics
| NLR | VTI | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.02 | 2.58 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.59 | 3.45 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.19 | 1.48 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.27 | 3.76 |
| Martin Ratio | 3.35 | 16.56 |
| Ulcer Index | 8.11% | 1.95% |
| Daily Std Dev | 26.54% | 12.51% |
| Max Drawdown | -66.96% | -55.45% |
| Current Drawdown | -9.03% | -2.43% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NLR vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
NLR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between NLR and VTI is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
NLR vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
NLR vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison
NLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, more than VTI's 1.29% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NLR VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF | 3.70% | 4.54% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 2.23% | 2.43% | 3.91% | 4.86% | 3.62% | 3.30% | 2.48% | 0.69% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.29% | 1.44% | 1.67% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% | 1.76% | 1.74% |
Drawdowns
NLR vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NLR drawdown since its inception was -66.96%, which is greater than VTI's maximum drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NLR and VTI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
NLR vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) has a higher volatility of 7.74% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 4.28%. This indicates that NLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.