NFJ vs. HTD
Compare and contrast key facts about Virtus Dividend, Interest and Premium Strategy Fund (NFJ) and John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund (HTD).
NFJ is managed by Virtus. It was launched on Feb 28, 2005. HTD is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Feb 25, 2004.
Performance
NFJ vs. HTD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NFJ vs. HTD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NFJ Virtus Dividend, Interest and Premium Strategy Fund | 0.23% | 12.40% | 9.96% | 21.30% | -23.90% | 26.75% | 12.42% | 30.88% | -11.97% | 12.74% |
HTD John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund | 6.73% | 15.87% | 25.68% | -9.92% | -6.24% | 32.36% | -16.54% | 42.77% | -9.13% | 16.47% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NFJ achieves a 0.23% return, which is significantly lower than HTD's 6.73% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NFJ having a 8.90% annualized return and HTD not far ahead at 8.93%.
NFJ
- 1D
- 1.69%
- 1M
- -4.65%
- YTD
- 0.23%
- 6M
- 1.64%
- 1Y
- 14.41%
- 3Y*
- 12.17%
- 5Y*
- 6.57%
- 10Y*
- 8.90%
HTD
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -3.65%
- YTD
- 6.73%
- 6M
- 3.81%
- 1Y
- 11.75%
- 3Y*
- 13.83%
- 5Y*
- 8.97%
- 10Y*
- 8.93%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NFJ vs. HTD - Expense Ratio Comparison
NFJ has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is higher than HTD's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
NFJ vs. HTD — Risk / Return Rank
NFJ
HTD
NFJ vs. HTD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Dividend, Interest and Premium Strategy Fund (NFJ) and John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund (HTD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NFJ | HTD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.85 | 0.74 | +0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.26 | 1.03 | +0.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.15 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.19 | 0.94 | +0.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.60 | 3.63 | +0.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NFJ | HTD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 0.74 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.51 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.39 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.42 | -0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between NFJ and HTD is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
NFJ vs. HTD - Dividend Comparison
NFJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.67%, more than HTD's 7.41% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NFJ Virtus Dividend, Interest and Premium Strategy Fund | 9.67% | 9.46% | 9.26% | 7.78% | 8.83% | 5.60% | 6.69% | 6.92% | 8.43% | 8.62% | 9.52% | 13.32% |
HTD John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund | 7.41% | 7.51% | 7.52% | 8.73% | 7.36% | 5.80% | 7.97% | 6.06% | 10.09% | 8.85% | 7.30% | 7.06% |
Drawdowns
NFJ vs. HTD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NFJ drawdown since its inception was -57.92%, smaller than the maximum HTD drawdown of -69.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFJ and HTD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NFJ | HTD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.92% | -69.79% | +11.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.61% | -13.27% | +0.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.57% | -31.58% | +1.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.96% | -56.57% | +15.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.65% | -3.65% | -3.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.88% | -8.86% | -2.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.25% | 3.44% | -0.19% |
Volatility
NFJ vs. HTD - Volatility Comparison
Virtus Dividend, Interest and Premium Strategy Fund (NFJ) has a higher volatility of 5.45% compared to John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund (HTD) at 4.59%. This indicates that NFJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HTD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NFJ | HTD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.45% | 4.59% | +0.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.43% | 9.56% | -0.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.10% | 16.06% | +1.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.99% | 17.71% | -0.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.57% | 22.71% | -4.14% |