NESG.L vs. XLKQ.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco NASDAQ-100 ESG UCITS ETF Acc (NESG.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L).
NESG.L and XLKQ.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NESG.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 ESG Index®. It was launched on Oct 25, 2021. XLKQ.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 2009. Both NESG.L and XLKQ.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
NESG.L vs. XLKQ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NESG.L vs. XLKQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NESG.L Invesco NASDAQ-100 ESG UCITS ETF Acc | -5.70% | 21.09% | 26.52% | 56.71% | -32.09% | 1.40% |
XLKQ.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc | -8.70% | 24.49% | 41.63% | 59.85% | -29.07% | 5.85% |
Different Trading Currencies
NESG.L is traded in USD, while XLKQ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XLKQ.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NESG.L achieves a -5.70% return, which is significantly higher than XLKQ.L's -8.70% return.
NESG.L
- 1D
- 3.45%
- 1M
- -2.31%
- YTD
- -5.70%
- 6M
- -2.59%
- 1Y
- 25.89%
- 3Y*
- 23.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLKQ.L
- 1D
- 3.65%
- 1M
- -2.97%
- YTD
- -8.70%
- 6M
- -6.79%
- 1Y
- 31.11%
- 3Y*
- 28.88%
- 5Y*
- 18.72%
- 10Y*
- 22.35%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NESG.L vs. XLKQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
NESG.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XLKQ.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
NESG.L vs. XLKQ.L — Risk / Return Rank
NESG.L
XLKQ.L
NESG.L vs. XLKQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ-100 ESG UCITS ETF Acc (NESG.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NESG.L | XLKQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.30 | 1.30 | 0.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.90 | 1.89 | +0.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.25 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.10 | 1.77 | +0.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.46 | 5.55 | +1.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NESG.L | XLKQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.30 | 1.30 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 1.03 | -0.52 |
Correlation
The correlation between NESG.L and XLKQ.L is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NESG.L vs. XLKQ.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither NESG.L nor XLKQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
NESG.L vs. XLKQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NESG.L drawdown since its inception was -34.69%, roughly equal to the maximum XLKQ.L drawdown of -35.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NESG.L and XLKQ.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NESG.L | XLKQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.69% | -28.74% | -5.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.01% | -16.76% | +4.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.22% | -13.73% | +5.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.41% | -5.08% | -4.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.38% | 6.21% | -2.83% |
Volatility
NESG.L vs. XLKQ.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco NASDAQ-100 ESG UCITS ETF Acc (NESG.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) have volatilities of 6.14% and 6.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NESG.L | XLKQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.14% | 6.31% | -0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.55% | 14.96% | -2.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.94% | 23.98% | -4.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.65% | 23.23% | -0.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.65% | 22.08% | +0.57% |