NDIV vs. MLPI

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

NDIV (Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF) and MLPI (NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NDIV is a Energy Equities fund tracking the EQM Natural Resources Dividend Income Index, while MLPI is a MLPs fund actively managed by NEOS. NDIV is passively managed, while MLPI is actively managed. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NDIV charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for MLPI.

Performance

NDIV vs. MLPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF (NDIV) and NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NDIV achieves a 27.13% return, which is significantly higher than MLPI's 19.61% return.

NDIV

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: -6.94%
• YTD: 27.13%
• 6M: 28.26%
• 1Y: 25.70%
• 3Y*: 17.25%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MLPI

• 1D: 1.09%
• 1M: -2.18%
• YTD: 19.61%
• 6M: 18.17%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NDIV vs. MLPI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NDIV Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF	27.13%	0.22%
MLPI NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF	19.61%	0.36%

Correlation

The correlation between NDIV and MLPI is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025	0.65

Return for Risk

NDIV vs. MLPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NDIV

NDIV Risk / Return Rank: 39
NDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
NDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
NDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 34
NDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
NDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 37

MLPI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NDIV vs. MLPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF (NDIV) and NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NDIV	MLPI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.29	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.79	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.41	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.45	—	—

Drawdowns

NDIV vs. MLPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NDIV drawdown since its inception was -19.73%, which is greater than MLPI's maximum drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDIV and MLPI.

Drawdown Indicators

	NDIV	MLPI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.73%	-5.38%	-14.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.73%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.73%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.07%	-2.18%	-5.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.23%	-1.49%	-2.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.73%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NDIV	MLPI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.97%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.53%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.18%	13.05%	+7.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.94%	13.05%	+7.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.94%	13.05%	+7.89%

NDIV vs. MLPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

NDIV has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPI's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

NDIV vs. MLPI - Dividend Comparison

NDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.81%, less than MLPI's 7.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
MLPI NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF	7.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NDIV Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF	6.81%	5.64%	5.88%	7.37%	1.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NDIV and MLPI in my portfolio?

NDIV and MLPI have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NDIV or MLPI?

On fees, NDIV is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NDIV or MLPI?

NDIV is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for MLPI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NDIV or MLPI?

MLPI has the higher dividend yield at 7.19%, compared with 6.81% for NDIV.

What is the main difference between NDIV and MLPI?

NDIV is categorized as Energy Equities, while MLPI is MLPs. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and NEOS. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for NDIV and 0.68% for MLPI.