NCLR.L vs. ZCLN.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about WisdomTree Uranium and Nuclear Energy UCITS ETF (NCLR.L) and BMO Clean Energy Index ETF (ZCLN.TO).
NCLR.L and ZCLN.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NCLR.L is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the WisdomTree Uranium and Nuclear Energy UCITS Index. It was launched on Mar 5, 2025. ZCLN.TO is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Clean Energy Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2021. Both NCLR.L and ZCLN.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
NCLR.L vs. ZCLN.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NCLR.L vs. ZCLN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NCLR.L WisdomTree Uranium and Nuclear Energy UCITS ETF | 21.09% | 112.38% |
ZCLN.TO BMO Clean Energy Index ETF | 13.40% | 37.53% |
Different Trading Currencies
NCLR.L is traded in GBp, while ZCLN.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the ZCLN.TO values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NCLR.L achieves a 21.09% return, which is significantly higher than ZCLN.TO's 13.40% return.
NCLR.L
- 1D
- 7.18%
- 1M
- -9.87%
- YTD
- 21.09%
- 6M
- 17.22%
- 1Y
- 159.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZCLN.TO
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- YTD
- 13.40%
- 6M
- 15.72%
- 1Y
- 55.76%
- 3Y*
- -3.75%
- 5Y*
- -3.45%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NCLR.L vs. ZCLN.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
NCLR.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than ZCLN.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NCLR.L vs. ZCLN.TO — Risk / Return Rank
NCLR.L
ZCLN.TO
NCLR.L vs. ZCLN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Uranium and Nuclear Energy UCITS ETF (NCLR.L) and BMO Clean Energy Index ETF (ZCLN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NCLR.L | ZCLN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.32 | 2.14 | +1.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.61 | 2.89 | +0.72 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.34 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.71 | 4.40 | +1.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.89 | 12.46 | +3.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NCLR.L | ZCLN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.32 | 2.14 | +1.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.13 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.01 | -0.32 | +3.33 |
Correlation
The correlation between NCLR.L and ZCLN.TO is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
NCLR.L vs. ZCLN.TO - Dividend Comparison
NCLR.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZCLN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NCLR.L WisdomTree Uranium and Nuclear Energy UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZCLN.TO BMO Clean Energy Index ETF | 1.51% | 1.71% | 2.13% | 1.37% | 0.93% | 0.83% |
Drawdowns
NCLR.L vs. ZCLN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NCLR.L drawdown since its inception was -28.14%, smaller than the maximum ZCLN.TO drawdown of -62.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCLR.L and ZCLN.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NCLR.L | ZCLN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.14% | -61.07% | +32.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.14% | -12.95% | -15.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -50.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.78% | -33.89% | +20.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.47% | -40.99% | +33.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.11% | 4.57% | +5.54% |
Volatility
NCLR.L vs. ZCLN.TO - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Uranium and Nuclear Energy UCITS ETF (NCLR.L) has a higher volatility of 15.78% compared to BMO Clean Energy Index ETF (ZCLN.TO) at 8.96%. This indicates that NCLR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZCLN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NCLR.L | ZCLN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.78% | 8.96% | +6.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.25% | 20.75% | +16.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.79% | 26.26% | +21.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.30% | 26.02% | +21.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.30% | 27.21% | +20.09% |