NCLR.L vs. INRA.AS
Compare and contrast key facts about WisdomTree Uranium and Nuclear Energy UCITS ETF (NCLR.L) and iShares Global Clean Energy Transition UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (INRA.AS).
NCLR.L and INRA.AS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NCLR.L is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the WisdomTree Uranium and Nuclear Energy UCITS Index. It was launched on Mar 5, 2025. INRA.AS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Clean Energy Transition. It was launched on Feb 23, 2022. Both NCLR.L and INRA.AS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
NCLR.L vs. INRA.AS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NCLR.L vs. INRA.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NCLR.L WisdomTree Uranium and Nuclear Energy UCITS ETF | 21.09% | 112.38% |
INRA.AS iShares Global Clean Energy Transition UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 13.69% | 38.58% |
Different Trading Currencies
NCLR.L is traded in GBp, while INRA.AS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the INRA.AS values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NCLR.L achieves a 21.09% return, which is significantly higher than INRA.AS's 13.69% return.
NCLR.L
- 1D
- 7.18%
- 1M
- -9.87%
- YTD
- 21.09%
- 6M
- 17.22%
- 1Y
- 159.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INRA.AS
- 1D
- 3.30%
- 1M
- 2.10%
- YTD
- 13.69%
- 6M
- 19.64%
- 1Y
- 59.03%
- 3Y*
- -3.42%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NCLR.L vs. INRA.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
NCLR.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than INRA.AS's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NCLR.L vs. INRA.AS — Risk / Return Rank
NCLR.L
INRA.AS
NCLR.L vs. INRA.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Uranium and Nuclear Energy UCITS ETF (NCLR.L) and iShares Global Clean Energy Transition UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (INRA.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NCLR.L | INRA.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.32 | 2.49 | +0.83 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.61 | 3.28 | +0.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.41 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.71 | 5.14 | +0.57 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.89 | 15.15 | +0.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NCLR.L | INRA.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.32 | 2.49 | +0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.01 | -0.03 | +3.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between NCLR.L and INRA.AS is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
NCLR.L vs. INRA.AS - Dividend Comparison
Neither NCLR.L nor INRA.AS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
NCLR.L vs. INRA.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NCLR.L drawdown since its inception was -28.14%, smaller than the maximum INRA.AS drawdown of -57.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCLR.L and INRA.AS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NCLR.L | INRA.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.14% | -54.31% | +26.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.14% | -11.34% | -16.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.78% | -18.85% | +5.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.47% | -29.97% | +22.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.11% | 3.62% | +6.49% |
Volatility
NCLR.L vs. INRA.AS - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Uranium and Nuclear Energy UCITS ETF (NCLR.L) has a higher volatility of 15.78% compared to iShares Global Clean Energy Transition UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (INRA.AS) at 8.25%. This indicates that NCLR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INRA.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NCLR.L | INRA.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.78% | 8.25% | +7.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.25% | 18.84% | +18.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.79% | 23.37% | +24.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.30% | 24.93% | +22.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.30% | 24.93% | +22.37% |