MXWO.L vs. VTI
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF (MXWO.L) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI).
MXWO.L and VTI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MXWO.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Apr 2, 2009. VTI is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the CRSP US Total Market Index. It was launched on May 24, 2001. Both MXWO.L and VTI are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MXWO.L or VTI.
Key characteristics
| MXWO.L | VTI | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 13.98% | 15.07% |
| 1Y Return | 20.17% | 22.00% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 7.14% | 8.38% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 12.17% | 14.12% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 9.48% | 12.20% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.77 | 1.82 |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.22% | 11.61% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.89% | -55.45% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.32% | -2.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between MXWO.L and VTI is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
MXWO.L vs. VTI - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, MXWO.L achieves a 13.98% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 15.07% return. Over the past 10 years, MXWO.L has underperformed VTI with an annualized return of 9.48%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively higher 12.20% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MXWO.L vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXWO.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MXWO.L vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF (MXWO.L) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MXWO.L vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison
MXWO.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXWO.L Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.35% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% | 1.76% | 1.74% |
Drawdowns
MXWO.L vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXWO.L drawdown since its inception was -33.89%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXWO.L and VTI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MXWO.L vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF (MXWO.L) is 2.36%, while Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) has a volatility of 2.63%. This indicates that MXWO.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.