MWOZ.L vs. FGQD.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist (MWOZ.L) and Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF (FGQD.L).
MWOZ.L and FGQD.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MWOZ.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Solactive GBS Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. It was launched on Nov 22, 2024. FGQD.L is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Fidelity Global Quality Income index. It was launched on Mar 27, 2017. Both MWOZ.L and FGQD.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
MWOZ.L vs. FGQD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MWOZ.L vs. FGQD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MWOZ.L Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist | -2.67% | 6.59% |
FGQD.L Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF | 2.11% | 7.57% |
Different Trading Currencies
MWOZ.L is traded in GBP, while FGQD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FGQD.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MWOZ.L achieves a -2.67% return, which is significantly lower than FGQD.L's 2.11% return.
MWOZ.L
- 1D
- 1.91%
- 1M
- -3.40%
- YTD
- -2.67%
- 6M
- 0.93%
- 1Y
- 15.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FGQD.L
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -2.62%
- YTD
- 2.11%
- 6M
- 4.91%
- 1Y
- 17.88%
- 3Y*
- 12.35%
- 5Y*
- 10.83%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MWOZ.L vs. FGQD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MWOZ.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FGQD.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MWOZ.L vs. FGQD.L — Risk / Return Rank
MWOZ.L
FGQD.L
MWOZ.L vs. FGQD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist (MWOZ.L) and Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF (FGQD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MWOZ.L | FGQD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.10 | 1.35 | -0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.56 | 1.82 | -0.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.29 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.03 | 3.39 | -1.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.65 | 14.53 | -6.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MWOZ.L | FGQD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.10 | 1.35 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.80 | -0.58 |
Correlation
The correlation between MWOZ.L and FGQD.L is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MWOZ.L vs. FGQD.L - Dividend Comparison
MWOZ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FGQD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MWOZ.L Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FGQD.L Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF | 1.80% | 1.87% | 2.31% | 2.78% | 2.69% | 2.46% | 2.60% | 2.44% | 2.70% | 1.56% |
Drawdowns
MWOZ.L vs. FGQD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MWOZ.L drawdown since its inception was -19.89%, smaller than the maximum FGQD.L drawdown of -26.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MWOZ.L and FGQD.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MWOZ.L | FGQD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.89% | -26.43% | +6.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.42% | -6.93% | -3.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.87% | -3.80% | -1.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.41% | -2.94% | -1.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.07% | 1.62% | +0.45% |
Volatility
MWOZ.L vs. FGQD.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist (MWOZ.L) has a higher volatility of 4.30% compared to Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF (FGQD.L) at 3.59%. This indicates that MWOZ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGQD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MWOZ.L | FGQD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.30% | 3.59% | +0.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.28% | 7.13% | +1.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.34% | 13.16% | +1.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.60% | 12.16% | +2.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.60% | 14.72% | -0.12% |