MWHYX vs. SCFIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Metropolitan West High Yield Bond Fund (MWHYX) and Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund (SCFIX).
MWHYX is managed by Metropolitan West Funds. It was launched on Sep 30, 2002. SCFIX is managed by Shenkman Funds. It was launched on Oct 31, 2012.
Performance
MWHYX vs. SCFIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MWHYX vs. SCFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MWHYX Metropolitan West High Yield Bond Fund | -1.19% | 6.09% | 6.24% | 10.77% | -12.58% | 2.85% | 11.47% | 12.30% | -0.91% | 6.23% |
SCFIX Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund | -0.61% | 7.02% | 6.11% | 9.24% | -2.52% | 5.08% | 3.36% | 7.61% | 0.85% | 3.54% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MWHYX achieves a -1.19% return, which is significantly lower than SCFIX's -0.61% return. Over the past 10 years, MWHYX has outperformed SCFIX with an annualized return of 4.55%, while SCFIX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.30% annualized return.
MWHYX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -1.74%
- YTD
- -1.19%
- 6M
- -0.43%
- 1Y
- 3.68%
- 3Y*
- 6.37%
- 5Y*
- 2.21%
- 10Y*
- 4.55%
SCFIX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -0.81%
- YTD
- -0.61%
- 6M
- 0.92%
- 1Y
- 5.06%
- 3Y*
- 6.27%
- 5Y*
- 4.65%
- 10Y*
- 4.30%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MWHYX vs. SCFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MWHYX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than SCFIX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MWHYX vs. SCFIX — Risk / Return Rank
MWHYX
SCFIX
MWHYX vs. SCFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Metropolitan West High Yield Bond Fund (MWHYX) and Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund (SCFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MWHYX | SCFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.30 | 2.61 | -1.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.97 | 3.70 | -1.74 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.65 | -0.36 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | 3.04 | -1.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.86 | 15.96 | -9.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MWHYX | SCFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.30 | 2.61 | -1.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 1.60 | -1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.03 | 1.32 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.39 | 1.30 | +0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between MWHYX and SCFIX is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
MWHYX vs. SCFIX - Dividend Comparison
MWHYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.60%, more than SCFIX's 5.00% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MWHYX Metropolitan West High Yield Bond Fund | 5.60% | 6.04% | 6.59% | 6.20% | 3.94% | 2.90% | 3.54% | 4.11% | 4.60% | 3.42% | 4.17% | 4.37% |
SCFIX Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund | 5.00% | 5.54% | 5.85% | 5.21% | 3.86% | 4.93% | 3.24% | 3.78% | 3.87% | 3.09% | 3.07% | 3.38% |
Drawdowns
MWHYX vs. SCFIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MWHYX drawdown since its inception was -28.94%, which is greater than SCFIX's maximum drawdown of -13.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MWHYX and SCFIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MWHYX | SCFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.94% | -13.08% | -15.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.49% | -1.63% | -0.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.95% | -6.30% | -9.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.95% | -13.08% | -2.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.90% | -1.01% | -0.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.41% | -0.52% | -1.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.60% | 0.31% | +0.29% |
Volatility
MWHYX vs. SCFIX - Volatility Comparison
Metropolitan West High Yield Bond Fund (MWHYX) has a higher volatility of 1.01% compared to Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund (SCFIX) at 0.79%. This indicates that MWHYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MWHYX | SCFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.01% | 0.79% | +0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.08% | 1.19% | +0.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.20% | 1.96% | +1.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.53% | 2.92% | +1.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.45% | 3.27% | +1.18% |