PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MWEQ.L vs. TSGB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MWEQ.L vs. TSGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI World Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (MWEQ.L) and VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF A (TSGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MWEQ.L vs. TSGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MWEQ.L
Invesco MSCI World Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc
0.83%21.96%0.07%
TSGB.L
VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF A
-0.32%28.47%-0.77%
Different Trading Currencies

MWEQ.L is traded in USD, while TSGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the TSGB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MWEQ.L achieves a 0.83% return, which is significantly higher than TSGB.L's -0.28% return.


MWEQ.L

1D
-0.65%
1M
-1.43%
YTD
0.83%
6M
3.74%
1Y
19.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSGB.L

1D
3.29%
1M
-4.49%
YTD
-0.28%
6M
5.13%
1Y
22.81%
3Y*
16.96%
5Y*
9.52%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MWEQ.L vs. TSGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MWEQ.L and TSGB.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

MWEQ.L vs. TSGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MWEQ.L
MWEQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
MWEQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MWEQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
MWEQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
MWEQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
MWEQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

TSGB.L
TSGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TSGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
TSGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MWEQ.L vs. TSGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI World Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (MWEQ.L) and VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF A (TSGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MWEQ.LTSGB.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.28

1.34

-0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.77

1.86

-0.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.26

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

2.12

+0.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.84

8.18

+1.66

MWEQ.L vs. TSGB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MWEQ.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is comparable to the TSGB.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MWEQ.L and TSGB.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MWEQ.LTSGB.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28

1.34

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

0.65

+0.34

Correlation

The correlation between MWEQ.L and TSGB.L is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

MWEQ.L vs. TSGB.L - Dividend Comparison

MWEQ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSGB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%.


TTM20252024202320222021
MWEQ.L
Invesco MSCI World Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TSGB.L
VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF A
2.22%2.23%2.63%2.56%2.67%1.20%

Drawdowns

MWEQ.L vs. TSGB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MWEQ.L drawdown since its inception was -12.95%, smaller than the maximum TSGB.L drawdown of -34.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MWEQ.L and TSGB.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MWEQ.LTSGB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.95%

-26.20%

+13.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.78%

-10.59%

+1.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.85%

-5.21%

-0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.70%

-3.46%

+1.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.16%

2.29%

-0.13%

Volatility

MWEQ.L vs. TSGB.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco MSCI World Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (MWEQ.L) is 5.41%, while VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF A (TSGB.L) has a volatility of 6.61%. This indicates that MWEQ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MWEQ.LTSGB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.41%

6.61%

-1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.42%

10.77%

-1.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.84%

16.92%

-2.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.08%

15.57%

-1.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.08%

17.27%

-3.19%