PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MWEQ.L vs. SGLS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MWEQ.L vs. SGLS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI World Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (MWEQ.L) and Invesco Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC (SGLS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MWEQ.L vs. SGLS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MWEQ.L
Invesco MSCI World Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc
1.49%21.96%0.07%
SGLS.L
Invesco Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC
9.08%76.07%-0.92%
Different Trading Currencies

MWEQ.L is traded in USD, while SGLS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SGLS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MWEQ.L achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly lower than SGLS.L's 9.08% return.


MWEQ.L

1D
3.02%
1M
-3.82%
YTD
1.49%
6M
4.34%
1Y
19.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SGLS.L

1D
4.19%
1M
-10.65%
YTD
9.08%
6M
21.27%
1Y
55.08%
3Y*
35.92%
5Y*
20.60%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MWEQ.L vs. SGLS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MWEQ.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SGLS.L's 0.34% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MWEQ.L vs. SGLS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MWEQ.L
MWEQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
MWEQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MWEQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
MWEQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
MWEQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
MWEQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

SGLS.L
SGLS.L Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
SGLS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGLS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGLS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SGLS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGLS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MWEQ.L vs. SGLS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI World Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (MWEQ.L) and Invesco Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC (SGLS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MWEQ.LSGLS.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.33

1.88

-0.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.83

2.37

-0.53

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.32

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

2.69

-0.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.51

9.61

-1.10

MWEQ.L vs. SGLS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MWEQ.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is comparable to the SGLS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MWEQ.L and SGLS.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MWEQ.LSGLS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

1.88

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.03

0.85

+0.18

Correlation

The correlation between MWEQ.L and SGLS.L is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

MWEQ.L vs. SGLS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MWEQ.L nor SGLS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

MWEQ.L vs. SGLS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MWEQ.L drawdown since its inception was -12.95%, smaller than the maximum SGLS.L drawdown of -37.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MWEQ.L and SGLS.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MWEQ.LSGLS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.95%

-21.94%

+8.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.50%

-17.93%

+7.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.24%

-10.03%

+4.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.69%

-6.78%

+5.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

4.60%

-2.27%

Volatility

MWEQ.L vs. SGLS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco MSCI World Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (MWEQ.L) is 5.81%, while Invesco Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC (SGLS.L) has a volatility of 11.57%. This indicates that MWEQ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SGLS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MWEQ.LSGLS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.81%

11.57%

-5.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.45%

23.56%

-14.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.85%

29.22%

-14.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.08%

22.38%

-8.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.08%

22.77%

-8.69%