PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MWEQ.L vs. MVOL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MWEQ.L vs. MVOL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI World Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (MWEQ.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS (MVOL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MWEQ.L vs. MVOL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MWEQ.L
Invesco MSCI World Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc
1.49%21.96%0.07%
MVOL.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS
0.33%11.02%-3.61%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MWEQ.L achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly higher than MVOL.L's 0.33% return.


MWEQ.L

1D
3.02%
1M
-3.82%
YTD
1.49%
6M
4.34%
1Y
19.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MVOL.L

1D
0.97%
1M
-3.64%
YTD
0.33%
6M
0.33%
1Y
2.99%
3Y*
9.29%
5Y*
6.14%
10Y*
7.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MWEQ.L vs. MVOL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MWEQ.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than MVOL.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MWEQ.L vs. MVOL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MWEQ.L
MWEQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
MWEQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MWEQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
MWEQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
MWEQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
MWEQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

MVOL.L
MVOL.L Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
MVOL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVOL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVOL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
MVOL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVOL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MWEQ.L vs. MVOL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI World Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (MWEQ.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS (MVOL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MWEQ.LMVOL.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.33

0.27

+1.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.83

0.43

+1.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.07

+0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

0.38

+1.87

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.51

1.59

+6.92

MWEQ.L vs. MVOL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MWEQ.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is higher than the MVOL.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MWEQ.L and MVOL.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MWEQ.LMVOL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

0.27

+1.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.03

0.73

+0.29

Correlation

The correlation between MWEQ.L and MVOL.L is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

MWEQ.L vs. MVOL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MWEQ.L nor MVOL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

MWEQ.L vs. MVOL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MWEQ.L drawdown since its inception was -12.95%, smaller than the maximum MVOL.L drawdown of -28.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MWEQ.L and MVOL.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MWEQ.LMVOL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.95%

-28.82%

+15.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.50%

-8.14%

-2.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.24%

-4.18%

-1.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.69%

-3.33%

+1.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

1.97%

+0.36%

Volatility

MWEQ.L vs. MVOL.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco MSCI World Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (MWEQ.L) has a higher volatility of 5.81% compared to iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS (MVOL.L) at 3.00%. This indicates that MWEQ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MVOL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MWEQ.LMVOL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.81%

3.00%

+2.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.45%

5.48%

+3.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.85%

10.91%

+3.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.08%

10.67%

+3.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.08%

11.66%

+2.42%