MWEP.L vs. MINV.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco MSCI World Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (MWEP.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L).
MWEP.L and MINV.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MWEP.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the MSCI World Equal Weighted Index. It was launched on Sep 4, 2024. MINV.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Nov 30, 2012. Both MWEP.L and MINV.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
MWEP.L vs. MINV.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MWEP.L vs. MINV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MWEP.L Invesco MSCI World Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc | 2.19% | 13.60% | 4.59% |
MINV.L iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF | 1.37% | 3.37% | 1.11% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MWEP.L achieves a 2.19% return, which is significantly higher than MINV.L's 1.37% return.
MWEP.L
- 1D
- 1.80%
- 1M
- -3.68%
- YTD
- 2.19%
- 6M
- 5.24%
- 1Y
- 15.85%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MINV.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -3.25%
- YTD
- 1.37%
- 6M
- 1.44%
- 1Y
- -0.18%
- 3Y*
- 6.61%
- 5Y*
- 6.91%
- 10Y*
- 7.97%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MWEP.L vs. MINV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MWEP.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than MINV.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MWEP.L vs. MINV.L — Risk / Return Rank
MWEP.L
MINV.L
MWEP.L vs. MINV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI World Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (MWEP.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MWEP.L | MINV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.20 | -0.02 | +1.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.67 | 0.04 | +1.62 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.01 | +0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.11 | 0.05 | +2.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.31 | 0.14 | +8.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MWEP.L | MINV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | -0.02 | +1.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.67 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.06 | 0.84 | +0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between MWEP.L and MINV.L is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
MWEP.L vs. MINV.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither MWEP.L nor MINV.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
MWEP.L vs. MINV.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MWEP.L drawdown since its inception was -14.02%, smaller than the maximum MINV.L drawdown of -20.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MWEP.L and MINV.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MWEP.L | MINV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.02% | -20.38% | +6.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.16% | -6.60% | -2.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -10.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -20.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.32% | -3.25% | -1.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.91% | -3.74% | +1.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 1.99% | -0.04% |
Volatility
MWEP.L vs. MINV.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco MSCI World Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (MWEP.L) has a higher volatility of 4.88% compared to iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L) at 2.80%. This indicates that MWEP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MWEP.L | MINV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.88% | 2.80% | +2.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.60% | 5.81% | +2.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.15% | 10.04% | +3.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.39% | 9.74% | +2.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.39% | 11.87% | +0.52% |