MVOL.L vs. VEA
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS (MVOL.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA).
MVOL.L and VEA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MVOL.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Nov 30, 2012. VEA is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE Index. It was launched on Jul 20, 2007. Both MVOL.L and VEA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MVOL.L or VEA.
Performance
MVOL.L vs. VEA - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MVOL.L achieves a 13.48% return, which is significantly higher than VEA's 4.90% return. Over the past 10 years, MVOL.L has outperformed VEA with an annualized return of 7.44%, while VEA has yielded a comparatively lower 5.30% annualized return.
MVOL.L
13.48%
-2.41%
7.29%
18.40%
5.56%
7.44%
VEA
4.90%
-4.77%
-2.27%
11.88%
5.94%
5.30%
Key characteristics
| MVOL.L | VEA | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.47 | 1.03 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.49 | 1.48 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.43 | 1.18 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.70 | 1.51 |
| Martin Ratio | 13.68 | 5.08 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.32% | 2.61% |
| Daily Std Dev | 7.32% | 12.82% |
| Max Drawdown | -28.82% | -60.70% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.41% | -7.41% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MVOL.L vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison
MVOL.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.05% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between MVOL.L and VEA is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MVOL.L vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS (MVOL.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MVOL.L vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison
MVOL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MVOL.L iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 3.04% | 3.16% | 2.91% | 3.16% | 2.04% | 3.04% | 3.35% | 2.77% | 3.05% | 2.92% | 3.68% | 2.60% |
Drawdowns
MVOL.L vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MVOL.L drawdown since its inception was -28.82%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVOL.L and VEA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MVOL.L vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS (MVOL.L) is 2.33%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 3.75%. This indicates that MVOL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.