PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MTUM vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MTUM vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTUM achieves a 31.46% return, which is significantly higher than VTI's 8.80% return. Over the past 10 years, MTUM has outperformed VTI with an annualized return of 17.44%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively lower 15.14% annualized return.


MTUM

1D
-0.41%
1M
8.29%
YTD
31.46%
6M
28.81%
1Y
39.62%
3Y*
33.68%
5Y*
15.03%
10Y*
17.44%

VTI

1D
-0.01%
1M
-0.86%
YTD
8.80%
6M
7.33%
1Y
22.77%
3Y*
20.62%
5Y*
11.81%
10Y*
15.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MTUM vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
31.46%22.15%32.89%9.15%-18.27%13.36%29.86%27.25%-1.67%37.50%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
8.80%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%30.67%-5.23%21.21%

Correlation

The correlation between MTUM and VTI is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2013

0.86

The correlation between MTUM and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

MTUM vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MTUM
VTI

Technology

50.2%
37.0%

Industrials

15.0%
9.4%

Energy

10.5%
3.3%

Communication Services

5.1%
9.8%

Financial Services

5.0%
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
4.3%

Healthcare

3.5%
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

2.9%
9.7%

Basic Materials

2.3%
1.9%

Real Estate

1.3%
2.3%

Utilities

0.6%
2.1%

Technology

MTUM
50.2%
VTI
37.0%

Industrials

MTUM
15.0%
VTI
9.4%

Energy

MTUM
10.5%
VTI
3.3%

Communication Services

MTUM
5.1%
VTI
9.8%

Financial Services

MTUM
5.0%
VTI
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

MTUM
3.7%
VTI
4.3%

Healthcare

MTUM
3.5%
VTI
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

MTUM
2.9%
VTI
9.7%

Basic Materials

MTUM
2.3%
VTI
1.9%

Real Estate

MTUM
1.3%
VTI
2.3%

Utilities

MTUM
0.6%
VTI
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MTUM vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTUM
MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MTUM vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MTUMVTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.32

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.45

2.56

+0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.13

11.37

+1.76

MTUM vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTUM Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTUM and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MTUM vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTUM drawdown since its inception was -34.08%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTUM and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MTUMVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.08%

-55.45%

+21.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.54%

-8.92%

-2.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.99%

-19.30%

-1.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.28%

-25.36%

-6.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.08%

-35.00%

+0.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.87%

-2.86%

-2.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.19%

-8.01%

+1.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

2.01%

+1.02%

Volatility

MTUM vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a higher volatility of 12.23% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 4.93%. This indicates that MTUM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MTUMVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.23%

4.93%

+7.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.36%

10.02%

+9.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.89%

12.80%

+9.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.15%

17.50%

+3.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.31%

18.31%

+3.00%

MTUM vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

MTUM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MTUM vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

MTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than VTI's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
0.56%0.91%0.75%1.35%1.80%0.55%0.83%1.48%1.27%1.02%1.43%1.12%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.04%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


MTUM and VTI have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTUM has higher volatility (12.23%) compared to VTI (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTUM dropped -34.08% vs VTI's -55.45%.

On 10-year performance, MTUM leads with 17.44% vs 15.14% for VTI. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 4.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 17.44% return vs 15.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MTUM.

VTI has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.56% for MTUM.

MTUM is categorized as Momentum, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MTUM and 0.03% for VTI.

MTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MTUM and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer