MTL.TO vs. CIGI.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Mullen Group Ltd. (MTL.TO) and Colliers International Group Inc. (CIGI.TO).
Performance
MTL.TO vs. CIGI.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MTL.TO vs. CIGI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTL.TO Mullen Group Ltd. | 10.97% | 14.66% | 9.57% | 1.51% | 31.70% | 10.96% | 23.04% | -19.32% | -19.13% | -18.83% |
CIGI.TO Colliers International Group Inc. | -26.53% | 3.42% | 16.92% | 35.12% | -33.77% | 66.54% | 12.21% | 34.46% | -0.61% | 53.57% |
Fundamentals
MTL.TO:
CA$2.27B
CIGI.TO:
CA$7.60B
MTL.TO:
CA$0.84
CIGI.TO:
CA$2.25
MTL.TO:
20.50
CIGI.TO:
65.91
MTL.TO:
1.02
CIGI.TO:
2.29
MTL.TO:
0.88
CIGI.TO:
1.23
MTL.TO:
1.99
CIGI.TO:
4.96
MTL.TO:
CA$2.13B
CIGI.TO:
CA$5.58B
MTL.TO:
CA$493.59M
CIGI.TO:
CA$2.10B
MTL.TO:
CA$324.64M
CIGI.TO:
CA$646.26M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MTL.TO achieves a 10.97% return, which is significantly higher than CIGI.TO's -26.53% return. Over the past 10 years, MTL.TO has underperformed CIGI.TO with an annualized return of 6.96%, while CIGI.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.13% annualized return.
MTL.TO
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 0.65%
- YTD
- 10.97%
- 6M
- 25.47%
- 1Y
- 44.51%
- 3Y*
- 11.24%
- 5Y*
- 11.81%
- 10Y*
- 6.96%
CIGI.TO
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -6.93%
- YTD
- -26.53%
- 6M
- -30.90%
- 1Y
- -15.59%
- 3Y*
- 1.54%
- 5Y*
- 2.43%
- 10Y*
- 12.13%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MTL.TO vs. CIGI.TO — Risk / Return Rank
MTL.TO
CIGI.TO
MTL.TO vs. CIGI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mullen Group Ltd. (MTL.TO) and Colliers International Group Inc. (CIGI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MTL.TO | CIGI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.88 | -0.47 | +2.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.38 | -0.44 | +2.82 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 0.94 | +0.43 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.12 | -0.35 | +5.47 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.57 | -0.90 | +15.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MTL.TO | CIGI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | -0.47 | +2.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.08 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | 0.35 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.62 | 0.43 | -1.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between MTL.TO and CIGI.TO is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
MTL.TO vs. CIGI.TO - Dividend Comparison
MTL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.87%, more than CIGI.TO's 0.28% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTL.TO Mullen Group Ltd. | 4.87% | 5.34% | 5.28% | 5.13% | 4.67% | 4.13% | 3.30% | 6.47% | 4.91% | 2.29% | 2.82% | 8.57% |
CIGI.TO Colliers International Group Inc. | 0.28% | 0.20% | 0.21% | 0.24% | 0.32% | 0.13% | 0.12% | 0.13% | 0.18% | 0.17% | 0.27% | 0.40% |
Drawdowns
MTL.TO vs. CIGI.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MTL.TO drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than CIGI.TO's maximum drawdown of -75.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTL.TO and CIGI.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MTL.TO | CIGI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -75.45% | -24.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.01% | -42.07% | +33.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.59% | -42.07% | +20.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.25% | -56.62% | -20.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.98% | -37.22% | -62.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -93.11% | -20.80% | -72.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.17% | 16.25% | -13.08% |
Volatility
MTL.TO vs. CIGI.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Mullen Group Ltd. (MTL.TO) is 8.71%, while Colliers International Group Inc. (CIGI.TO) has a volatility of 10.97%. This indicates that MTL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIGI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MTL.TO | CIGI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.71% | 10.97% | -2.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.95% | 26.29% | -8.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.83% | 33.65% | -9.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.91% | 30.70% | -3.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.96% | 34.40% | -2.44% |
Financials
MTL.TO vs. CIGI.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mullen Group Ltd. and Colliers International Group Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MTL.TO vs. CIGI.TO - Profitability Comparison
MTL.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Mullen Group Ltd. reported a gross profit of 118.62M and revenue of 533.88M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.2%.
CIGI.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Colliers International Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 524.07M and revenue of 1.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.1%.
MTL.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Mullen Group Ltd. reported an operating income of 36.86M and revenue of 533.88M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.9%.
CIGI.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Colliers International Group Inc. reported an operating income of 143.53M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.8%.
MTL.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Mullen Group Ltd. reported a net income of 14.61M and revenue of 533.88M, resulting in a net margin of 2.7%.
CIGI.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Colliers International Group Inc. reported a net income of 62.06M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in a net margin of 3.8%.