PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MTB vs. MS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


MTBMS
YTD Return59.71%47.19%
1Y Return76.54%72.26%
3Y Return (Ann)13.81%13.81%
5Y Return (Ann)8.99%26.08%
10Y Return (Ann)8.49%17.21%
Sharpe Ratio2.762.85
Sortino Ratio3.803.78
Omega Ratio1.471.53
Calmar Ratio2.423.07
Martin Ratio19.2216.07
Ulcer Index4.13%4.68%
Daily Std Dev28.71%26.40%
Max Drawdown-73.50%-88.12%
Current Drawdown-1.52%-0.82%

Fundamentals


MTBMS
Market Cap$35.38B$213.16B
EPS$13.52$6.58
PE Ratio15.7720.11
PEG Ratio1.373.87
Total Revenue (TTM)$12.37B$58.28B
Gross Profit (TTM)$12.37B$42.91B
EBITDA (TTM)$1.59B$17.24B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between MTB and MS is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

MTB vs. MS - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, MTB achieves a 59.71% return, which is significantly higher than MS's 47.19% return. Over the past 10 years, MTB has underperformed MS with an annualized return of 8.49%, while MS has yielded a comparatively higher 17.21% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
41.33%
35.25%
MTB
MS

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MTB vs. MS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for M&T Bank Corporation (MTB) and Morgan Stanley (MS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MTB
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MTB, currently valued at 2.76, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.76
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MTB, currently valued at 3.80, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.80
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MTB, currently valued at 1.47, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.47
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MTB, currently valued at 2.42, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.42
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MTB, currently valued at 19.22, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0019.22
MS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MS, currently valued at 2.85, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.85
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MS, currently valued at 3.78, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.78
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MS, currently valued at 1.53, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.53
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MS, currently valued at 3.07, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.003.07
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MS, currently valued at 16.07, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0016.07

MTB vs. MS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTB Sharpe Ratio is 2.76, which is comparable to the MS Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTB and MS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.503.003.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.76
2.85
MTB
MS

Dividends

MTB vs. MS - Dividend Comparison

MTB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, less than MS's 2.68% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
MTB
M&T Bank Corporation
2.49%3.79%3.31%2.93%3.46%2.42%2.48%1.75%1.79%2.31%2.23%2.41%
MS
Morgan Stanley
2.68%3.49%3.47%2.14%2.04%2.54%2.77%1.72%1.66%1.73%0.90%0.64%

Drawdowns

MTB vs. MS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTB drawdown since its inception was -73.50%, smaller than the maximum MS drawdown of -88.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTB and MS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-1.52%
-0.82%
MTB
MS

Volatility

MTB vs. MS - Volatility Comparison

M&T Bank Corporation (MTB) has a higher volatility of 14.15% compared to Morgan Stanley (MS) at 12.59%. This indicates that MTB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
14.15%
12.59%
MTB
MS

Financials

MTB vs. MS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between M&T Bank Corporation and Morgan Stanley. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items