MOTIX vs. LSMSX
Compare and contrast key facts about BNY Mellon Municipal Opportunities Fund (MOTIX) and Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund (LSMSX).
MOTIX is managed by BNY Mellon. It was launched on Oct 14, 2008. LSMSX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Dec 22, 2015.
Performance
MOTIX vs. LSMSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MOTIX vs. LSMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOTIX BNY Mellon Municipal Opportunities Fund | 0.00% | 3.74% | 3.44% | 6.60% | -10.86% | 2.81% | 4.76% | 8.03% | 2.29% | 5.19% |
LSMSX Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund | -0.27% | 3.22% | 2.22% | 7.96% | -10.03% | 4.11% | 4.48% | 8.16% | 0.46% | 4.92% |
Returns By Period
MOTIX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LSMSX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -2.62%
- YTD
- -0.27%
- 6M
- 1.22%
- 1Y
- 3.63%
- 3Y*
- 3.26%
- 5Y*
- 1.12%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MOTIX vs. LSMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MOTIX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than LSMSX's 0.01% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MOTIX vs. LSMSX — Risk / Return Rank
MOTIX
LSMSX
MOTIX vs. LSMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Municipal Opportunities Fund (MOTIX) and Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund (LSMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MOTIX | LSMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.67 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.58 | — |
Correlation
The correlation between MOTIX and LSMSX is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MOTIX vs. LSMSX - Dividend Comparison
MOTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, less than LSMSX's 3.97% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOTIX BNY Mellon Municipal Opportunities Fund | 2.74% | 4.35% | 3.46% | 2.32% | 3.64% | 2.06% | 2.60% | 3.32% | 3.19% | 2.83% | 3.45% | 3.21% |
LSMSX Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund | 3.97% | 3.83% | 4.30% | 3.37% | 2.38% | 2.73% | 2.33% | 2.55% | 2.34% | 0.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MOTIX vs. LSMSX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MOTIX | LSMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -15.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -2.62% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -2.88% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.21% | — |
Volatility
MOTIX vs. LSMSX - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MOTIX | LSMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.10% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.60% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 5.78% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 4.44% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 4.52% | — |