MNY.TO vs. CSAV.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Purpose Cash Management Fund (MNY.TO) and CI High Interest Savings ETF (CSAV.TO).
MNY.TO and CSAV.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MNY.TO is an actively managed fund by Purpose Investments. It was launched on Sep 14, 2022. CSAV.TO is an actively managed fund by CI Investments. It was launched on Jun 14, 2019.
Performance
MNY.TO vs. CSAV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MNY.TO vs. CSAV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNY.TO Purpose Cash Management Fund | 0.53% | 3.03% | 4.69% | 5.03% | 1.54% |
CSAV.TO CI High Interest Savings ETF | 0.47% | 2.55% | 4.43% | 5.05% | 1.21% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNY.TO achieves a 0.53% return, which is significantly higher than CSAV.TO's 0.47% return.
MNY.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 0.53%
- 6M
- 1.27%
- 1Y
- 2.70%
- 3Y*
- 4.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSAV.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 0.47%
- 6M
- 1.03%
- 1Y
- 2.33%
- 3Y*
- 3.76%
- 5Y*
- 3.04%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MNY.TO vs. CSAV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNY.TO has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than CSAV.TO's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
MNY.TO vs. CSAV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
MNY.TO
CSAV.TO
MNY.TO vs. CSAV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Cash Management Fund (MNY.TO) and CI High Interest Savings ETF (CSAV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MNY.TO | CSAV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 15.40 | 10.10 | +5.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 52.97 | 29.27 | +23.70 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 20.07 | 6.24 | +13.83 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 67.62 | 116.55 | -48.92 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 621.44 | 444.78 | +176.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MNY.TO | CSAV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.40 | 10.10 | +5.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 11.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 11.03 | 10.18 | +0.84 |
Correlation
The correlation between MNY.TO and CSAV.TO is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
MNY.TO vs. CSAV.TO - Dividend Comparison
MNY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, more than CSAV.TO's 2.32% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNY.TO Purpose Cash Management Fund | 2.67% | 2.93% | 4.71% | 4.85% | 1.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CSAV.TO CI High Interest Savings ETF | 2.32% | 2.54% | 4.40% | 4.90% | 2.15% | 0.73% | 0.97% | 1.14% |
Drawdowns
MNY.TO vs. CSAV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNY.TO drawdown since its inception was -0.24%, which is greater than CSAV.TO's maximum drawdown of -0.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNY.TO and CSAV.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNY.TO | CSAV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.24% | -0.03% | -0.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.04% | -0.02% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.00% | 0.01% | -0.01% |
Volatility
MNY.TO vs. CSAV.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Purpose Cash Management Fund (MNY.TO) is 0.03%, while CI High Interest Savings ETF (CSAV.TO) has a volatility of 0.07%. This indicates that MNY.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSAV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MNY.TO | CSAV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.03% | 0.07% | -0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.13% | 0.17% | -0.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18% | 0.23% | -0.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.38% | 0.27% | +0.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.38% | 0.26% | +0.12% |