MNTRX vs. UMMGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Allspring Core Bond Fund (MNTRX) and Columbia Bond Fund (UMMGX).
MNTRX is managed by Allspring Global Investments. It was launched on Jun 30, 1997. UMMGX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Jan 9, 1986.
Performance
MNTRX vs. UMMGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MNTRX vs. UMMGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNTRX Allspring Core Bond Fund | -0.34% | 7.16% | 1.38% | 5.37% | -13.82% | -2.10% | 8.51% | 8.18% | -0.57% | 3.28% |
UMMGX Columbia Bond Fund | 0.03% | 8.03% | 2.06% | 6.73% | -15.66% | -0.79% | 9.10% | 9.23% | -0.50% | 3.73% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNTRX achieves a -0.34% return, which is significantly lower than UMMGX's 0.03% return. Over the past 10 years, MNTRX has underperformed UMMGX with an annualized return of 1.46%, while UMMGX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.07% annualized return.
MNTRX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.60%
- YTD
- -0.34%
- 6M
- 0.22%
- 1Y
- 3.70%
- 3Y*
- 3.39%
- 5Y*
- -0.15%
- 10Y*
- 1.46%
UMMGX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.33%
- YTD
- 0.03%
- 6M
- 0.67%
- 1Y
- 4.72%
- 3Y*
- 4.20%
- 5Y*
- 0.12%
- 10Y*
- 2.07%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MNTRX vs. UMMGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNTRX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than UMMGX's 0.52% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MNTRX vs. UMMGX — Risk / Return Rank
MNTRX
UMMGX
MNTRX vs. UMMGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Core Bond Fund (MNTRX) and Columbia Bond Fund (UMMGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MNTRX | UMMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.82 | 1.31 | -0.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.18 | 1.95 | -0.77 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.23 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | 2.09 | -0.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.96 | 6.63 | -2.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MNTRX | UMMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 | 1.31 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | 0.02 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | 0.40 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 0.94 | -0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between MNTRX and UMMGX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MNTRX vs. UMMGX - Dividend Comparison
MNTRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, less than UMMGX's 4.08% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNTRX Allspring Core Bond Fund | 3.74% | 4.07% | 4.13% | 3.19% | 1.85% | 1.75% | 6.35% | 2.46% | 2.33% | 1.74% | 1.97% | 1.45% |
UMMGX Columbia Bond Fund | 4.08% | 4.20% | 3.70% | 3.73% | 2.73% | 1.76% | 4.77% | 4.21% | 2.71% | 1.88% | 4.66% | 3.56% |
Drawdowns
MNTRX vs. UMMGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNTRX drawdown since its inception was -19.36%, smaller than the maximum UMMGX drawdown of -20.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNTRX and UMMGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNTRX | UMMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.36% | -20.86% | +1.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.82% | -2.76% | -0.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.91% | -20.86% | +1.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.36% | -20.86% | +1.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.75% | -2.58% | -1.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.45% | -2.73% | +0.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.98% | 0.87% | +0.11% |
Volatility
MNTRX vs. UMMGX - Volatility Comparison
Allspring Core Bond Fund (MNTRX) has a higher volatility of 1.58% compared to Columbia Bond Fund (UMMGX) at 1.05%. This indicates that MNTRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UMMGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MNTRX | UMMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.58% | 1.05% | +0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.63% | 2.35% | +0.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.41% | 4.43% | -0.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.00% | 6.31% | -0.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.94% | 5.18% | -0.24% |