MNTRX vs. TCPYX
Compare and contrast key facts about Allspring Core Bond Fund (MNTRX) and Touchstone Impact Bond Fund (TCPYX).
MNTRX is managed by Allspring Global Investments. It was launched on Jun 30, 1997. TCPYX is managed by Touchstone. It was launched on Nov 15, 1991.
Performance
MNTRX vs. TCPYX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MNTRX vs. TCPYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNTRX Allspring Core Bond Fund | -0.34% | 7.16% | 1.38% | 5.37% | -13.82% | -2.10% | 8.51% | 8.18% | -0.57% | 3.28% |
TCPYX Touchstone Impact Bond Fund | 0.31% | 6.75% | 1.77% | 5.32% | -13.07% | -1.01% | 6.72% | 7.91% | 0.16% | 3.94% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNTRX achieves a -0.34% return, which is significantly lower than TCPYX's 0.31% return. Over the past 10 years, MNTRX has underperformed TCPYX with an annualized return of 1.46%, while TCPYX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.70% annualized return.
MNTRX
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -1.68%
- YTD
- -0.34%
- 6M
- 0.31%
- 1Y
- 3.61%
- 3Y*
- 3.39%
- 5Y*
- -0.15%
- 10Y*
- 1.46%
TCPYX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -1.19%
- YTD
- 0.31%
- 6M
- 1.23%
- 1Y
- 3.96%
- 3Y*
- 3.75%
- 5Y*
- 0.27%
- 10Y*
- 1.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MNTRX vs. TCPYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNTRX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than TCPYX's 0.51% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MNTRX vs. TCPYX — Risk / Return Rank
MNTRX
TCPYX
MNTRX vs. TCPYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Core Bond Fund (MNTRX) and Touchstone Impact Bond Fund (TCPYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MNTRX | TCPYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.89 | 0.99 | -0.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.27 | 1.43 | -0.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.18 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.44 | 1.54 | -0.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.19 | 4.24 | -0.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MNTRX | TCPYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | 0.99 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | 0.05 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | 0.35 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 0.69 | +0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between MNTRX and TCPYX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MNTRX vs. TCPYX - Dividend Comparison
MNTRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, less than TCPYX's 3.89% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNTRX Allspring Core Bond Fund | 3.74% | 4.07% | 4.13% | 3.19% | 1.85% | 1.75% | 6.35% | 2.46% | 2.33% | 1.74% | 1.97% | 1.45% |
TCPYX Touchstone Impact Bond Fund | 3.89% | 3.52% | 3.68% | 3.22% | 2.63% | 1.91% | 2.13% | 2.63% | 2.86% | 2.77% | 2.98% | 2.91% |
Drawdowns
MNTRX vs. TCPYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNTRX drawdown since its inception was -19.36%, which is greater than TCPYX's maximum drawdown of -18.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNTRX and TCPYX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNTRX | TCPYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.36% | -18.12% | -1.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.82% | -2.94% | +0.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.91% | -18.12% | -0.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.36% | -18.12% | -1.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.75% | -2.19% | -1.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.45% | -3.23% | +0.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.97% | 1.07% | -0.10% |
Volatility
MNTRX vs. TCPYX - Volatility Comparison
Allspring Core Bond Fund (MNTRX) has a higher volatility of 1.58% compared to Touchstone Impact Bond Fund (TCPYX) at 1.50%. This indicates that MNTRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TCPYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MNTRX | TCPYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.58% | 1.50% | +0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.63% | 2.62% | +0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.41% | 4.49% | -0.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.00% | 5.88% | +0.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.94% | 4.83% | +0.11% |