PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MNHYX vs. FOCIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MNHYX vs. FOCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series (MNHYX) and Fairholme Focused Income Fund (FOCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNHYX achieves a 2.79% return, which is significantly lower than FOCIX's 7.06% return. Over the past 10 years, MNHYX has underperformed FOCIX with an annualized return of 6.63%, while FOCIX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.09% annualized return.


MNHYX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.42%
YTD
2.79%
6M
3.21%
1Y
7.22%
3Y*
9.32%
5Y*
5.47%
10Y*
6.63%

FOCIX

1D
-0.64%
1M
-0.96%
YTD
7.06%
6M
6.77%
1Y
10.86%
3Y*
11.44%
5Y*
9.36%
10Y*
7.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MNHYX vs. FOCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MNHYX
Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series
2.79%6.65%9.63%13.19%-7.59%9.99%6.26%13.99%-1.30%8.49%
FOCIX
Fairholme Focused Income Fund
7.06%6.17%14.67%12.58%6.00%6.73%0.99%7.44%-6.88%-0.54%

Correlation

The correlation between MNHYX and FOCIX is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010

0.28

Over the past year, the correlation between MNHYX and FOCIX has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.28, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MNHYX vs. FOCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNHYX
MNHYX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
MNHYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNHYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNHYX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
MNHYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNHYX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

FOCIX
FOCIX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
FOCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
FOCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNHYX vs. FOCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series (MNHYX) and Fairholme Focused Income Fund (FOCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MNHYXFOCIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.25

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

3.11

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.31

8.63

+4.68

MNHYX vs. FOCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNHYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is higher than the FOCIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNHYX and FOCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MNHYX vs. FOCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNHYX drawdown since its inception was -19.70%, roughly equal to the maximum FOCIX drawdown of -18.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNHYX and FOCIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MNHYXFOCIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.70%

-18.78%

-0.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.51%

-3.33%

+0.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.43%

-7.96%

+3.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.84%

-12.36%

+1.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.70%

-18.61%

-1.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-2.09%

+1.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.56%

-4.76%

+3.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.56%

1.20%

-0.64%

Volatility

MNHYX vs. FOCIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series (MNHYX) is 0.73%, while Fairholme Focused Income Fund (FOCIX) has a volatility of 2.83%. This indicates that MNHYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FOCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MNHYXFOCIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.73%

2.83%

-2.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.19%

5.85%

-3.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.75%

7.56%

-4.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.71%

9.59%

-5.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.13%

9.09%

-4.96%

MNHYX vs. FOCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MNHYX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than FOCIX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

MNHYX vs. FOCIX - Dividend Comparison

MNHYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.64%, more than FOCIX's 1.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FOCIX
Fairholme Focused Income Fund
1.23%1.31%2.46%2.82%2.24%1.12%0.65%2.75%4.57%9.83%5.16%5.51%
MNHYX
Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series
6.64%6.95%6.38%6.66%5.93%7.93%4.98%6.63%5.26%5.16%6.49%5.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


MNHYX and FOCIX have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FOCIX has higher volatility (2.83%) compared to MNHYX (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MNHYX dropped -19.70% vs FOCIX's -18.78%.

MNHYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MNHYX and FOCIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer