MLR vs. BLBD

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Miller Industries, Inc. (MLR) and Blue Bird Corporation (BLBD).

Performance

MLR vs. BLBD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Miller Industries, Inc. (MLR) and Blue Bird Corporation (BLBD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MLR vs. BLBD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MLR Miller Industries, Inc.	22.48%	-41.73%	56.58%	61.77%	-17.93%	-10.51%	4.82%	40.68%	7.49%	0.32%
BLBD Blue Bird Corporation	20.83%	21.67%	43.29%	151.73%	-31.52%	-14.35%	-20.33%	26.00%	-8.59%	28.80%

Fundamentals

Market Cap MLR : $527.10M BLBD : $1.85B
EPS MLR : $1.99 BLBD : $3.97
PE Ratio MLR : 22.94 BLBD : 14.30
PEG Ratio MLR : 0.58 BLBD : 0.13
PS Ratio MLR : 0.67 BLBD : 1.24
PB Ratio MLR : 1.25 BLBD : 6.83
Total Revenue (TTM) MLR : $789.52M BLBD : $1.50B
Gross Profit (TTM) MLR : $120.39M BLBD : $314.43M
EBITDA (TTM) MLR : $43.30M BLBD : $188.65M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLR achieves a 22.48% return, which is significantly higher than BLBD's 20.83% return. Over the past 10 years, MLR has underperformed BLBD with an annualized return of 10.67%, while BLBD has yielded a comparatively higher 18.06% annualized return.

MLR

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: 8.90%
• YTD: 22.48%
• 6M: 13.84%
• 1Y: 9.60%
• 3Y*: 10.70%
• 5Y*: 1.42%
• 10Y*: 10.67%

BLBD

• 1D: 4.36%
• 1M: -2.54%
• YTD: 20.83%
• 6M: -1.32%
• 1Y: 75.44%
• 3Y*: 40.61%
• 5Y*: 16.25%
• 10Y*: 18.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

MLR vs. BLBD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLR

MLR Risk / Return Rank: 49
MLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
MLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
MLR Omega Ratio Rank: 45
MLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
MLR Martin Ratio Rank: 51

BLBD

BLBD Risk / Return Rank: 87
BLBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
BLBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
BLBD Omega Ratio Rank: 86
BLBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
BLBD Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLR vs. BLBD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Miller Industries, Inc. (MLR) and Blue Bird Corporation (BLBD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MLR	BLBD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.31	1.86	-1.55
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.65	2.76	-2.11
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.34	-0.26
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.40	3.09	-2.69
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.81	7.03	-6.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MLR vs. BLBD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLR Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is lower than the BLBD Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLR and BLBD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MLR	BLBD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31	1.86	-1.55
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.05	0.29	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.35	0.36	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.11	0.34	-0.23

Correlation

The correlation between MLR and BLBD is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

MLR vs. BLBD - Dividend Comparison

MLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, while BLBD has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MLR Miller Industries, Inc.	1.78%	2.14%	1.16%	1.70%	2.70%	2.16%	1.89%	1.94%	2.67%	2.79%	2.57%	2.94%
BLBD Blue Bird Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

MLR vs. BLBD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLR drawdown since its inception was -98.14%, which is greater than BLBD's maximum drawdown of -74.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLR and BLBD.

Drawdown Indicators

	MLR	BLBD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.14%	-74.16%	-23.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.66%	-23.45%	-0.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-53.25%	-74.16%	+20.91%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-53.25%	-74.16%	+20.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-39.92%	-8.89%	-31.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-69.81%	-20.88%	-48.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.72%	10.31%	+1.41%

Volatility

MLR vs. BLBD - Volatility Comparison

Miller Industries, Inc. (MLR) and Blue Bird Corporation (BLBD) have volatilities of 9.88% and 10.12%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MLR	BLBD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.88%	10.12%	-0.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.54%	27.65%	-8.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.32%	40.82%	-9.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.49%	56.67%	-26.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.86%	50.91%	-20.05%

Financials

MLR vs. BLBD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Miller Industries, Inc. and Blue Bird Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

MLR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Miller Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 26.53M and revenue of 171.17M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.5%.

BLBD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Blue Bird Corporation reported a gross profit of 71.23M and revenue of 333.08M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.4%.

MLR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Miller Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 5.46M and revenue of 171.17M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.2%.

BLBD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Blue Bird Corporation reported an operating income of 37.68M and revenue of 333.08M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.3%.

MLR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Miller Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 3.41M and revenue of 171.17M, resulting in a net margin of 2.0%.

BLBD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Blue Bird Corporation reported a net income of 30.76M and revenue of 333.08M, resulting in a net margin of 9.2%.